Issac Asimov's I, Robot

Issac Asimov I, robot Asimov's robot is a clumsy, diligent, cost-effective, soul free, strong, fast, obedient, manmade, cleaner, more diverse, more human than humans Can be explained as things. Robots can be caring, gentle, self conscious, creative, intelligent, evil, and rebellious. Robots are made of metal, plastic, aluminum, gears, bolts, wheels, sensors, memory chips and other equipment. Text Study Asimov's book "I, robot" is full of exciting short stories about the relationship between humans and robots. But one story I was really impressed was the first of nine: the lobby.

Isaac Asimov is one of the most outstanding science fiction writers in the world, a skilled scientist. It should be understood that Isaac Asimov proposed this imaginative creativity 75 years ago, and that the world has no clues about the concept of robots, thereby adding a new flavor to science fiction. His novel is still fascinating SF enthusiasts around the world. His idea of ​​space operators is mainly to stimulate readers. People who want to try literature should like his masterpiece.

75 years since Isaac Asimov proposed his famous "three robot method", he introduced the robot as an employee (clean family, pilot spacecraft, etc.) and if the robot does not follow I said not to. A set of rules ensures that they do not harm human beings. These laws are designed to avoid so-called robotic riots, the robot loses control and ultimately threatens human life. In his science fiction novel he ordered these laws to be embedded in the software controlling the robot and not be bypassed, changed or overwritten. However, he also explains situations where some of the shortcomings and vulnerabilities of robot programming lead to supernatural behavior.

Isaac Asimov asked similar questions in his book "I, Robots" (a summary of robot stories). In his book Asimov asked how robots treat "the three laws of robots" which are "manufactured and protected to protect the robot from harm". It is not so obvious to answer this question, "What is it that does not harm human beings?" Therefore, he added a provision and called it the '0 th rule'. Let's talk about "the occurrence of harm to humans due to inaction". Can we claim that complete destruction of nature's balance is destruction of mankind? Then, how about over consumption of Western countries? Imagine that 7 billion people can survive because 100 million people will die. Can you do what you need?