Is Violence in Films Responsible For Children's Agressive Behavior?

Whether violence in movies is the cause of child's aggression. Violence on the screen is usually offered to young people who respond to it in various ways. Psychological development of children is based on social experience and imitation. Children are affected by their families (direct source of infection) or the surrounding environment (source of indirect infection). The problem I seek is the responsibility of film violence for child attacks.

Dictionary, violence is consumption of physical strength, so it hurt or abuse. Violence is usually a behavioral response that children are taught to achieve their goals. On the other hand, violence may be a routine and automatic way to deal with the stress situation of a particular child (Young Violence and Suicide Prevention Group 1999). Your violence is an ancient matter, and in many cases is a question that is calling a lot of debate. Unfortunately, child violence is increasing

Obviously, violence is a common element of the media, but does media violence lead to violence against children? Is the media responsible for child violence? These are issues that have been discussed by countless experts and knowledgeable experts. The answers to these questions are not easy to reach and are consistent with the ancient questions. Does violence in the media encourage children to act violently and positively act? Or are violent and violent children fascinated by television violence and fascinated by media violence? These controversial issues can be shown indefinitely, and both sides have strong evidence. The problem here is whether violence in the media could have some negative impact on children. Evidence evidencing this adverse effect rarely controversial. This direct causal relationship is controversial