Is Violence ever justified Essay

Discussion on the use of violence has been continuing for the past 10 years. Violence is an act of injuring another person voluntarily and is often classified as misunderstanding and irrationality. It is well known that commonsense knowledge that attacks or harm others is "wrong". Most of us do not like people who appeal to such violence, they will be punished by law. However, in the 21st century, the boundary of violence using "permanent" or "reasonable" is becoming more and more blurred. It can be said that the need for war, punishment and even domestic violence could prevent further violence or hinder current violence from intensifying. Show more

Therefore, some people think that such violence is unreasonable and that they should be sentenced to life imprisonment. However, some criminals have committed such a violent crime, such as Osama bin Laden's attack on 9th September, but people cheered and celebrated his murder and considered it fair and equitable It was. Therefore, it is difficult to draw a line during the death penalty

Parents and schools punishing children can also be considered violent. Let's forgive, let's love our children. Many parents, especially parents of Asian countries, think that it is appropriate to punish children by violence, that is, beat with both hands and canes. By harming these harmful children, parents warn their children not to do anything. Schools also take disciplinary action against students who have committed crimes such as fraud and theft. Parents and teachers play an indispensable role in the formation of moral qualities for young people, and in a sense, they are responsible for raising children. This kind of violence is justified. Their mistakes

However, there is a thin line between discipline and abuse. Some parents are sometimes drunk, even those who use slings and hangers to whip their children.

I do not know if the violence is reasonable or not. But I know that violence tends to "solve" the problem, and those who claim totally non-violent or violent behavior eventually all overhear violence I know to find out.

Is violence reasonable? Discussion on the use of violence has been continuing for the past 10 years. Violence is an act of injuring another person voluntarily and is often classified as misunderstanding and irrationality. It is well known that commonsense knowledge that attacks or harm others is "wrong". Most of us do not like people who appeal to such violence, they will be punished by law. However, as we enter the 21st century

I went to South Africa and thought this would be a tough trial of whether violence was reasonable or not. I came back from South Africa and said that violence did not make sense for the first time in my life that only nonviolence is effective in South Africa. I think history is proving like this

Who has the right to decide whether it is reasonable and violent? Is it reasonable under any circumstances? There is no clear answer to these questions. It is only a comment. One view has the view that violence is reasonable for innocent people, as long as it leads to higher profits such as freedom, democracy, freedom, equality. Regardless of the situation, I think violence is immoral. I do not think that violence is truly streamlined, and that will eventually become a vicious circle. For example, in today's society, violence has occurred in the United States and Iraq. As we now recognize, when violence is given to us, the United States then responds with violence, then respond with more violence from Iraqis and then start the cycle. There are two other contradictory views in Walker and King's book.