Is there any scientific proof that God exists?

"In my second article, he says that the existence of God (swt) is related to the existence belief, because his creation is beyond our imagination, his knowledge is It is meaningless, but he shows signs to prove him.

Let's rewrite a bit. Let's assume that Alla represents y and that y is wider than all human beings, your first argument is as follows.

If my reconstruction is right, this premise is mysterious. As far as the logic of "to" is concerned, let us assume that we are discussing what is the cause of the classic. So (1), Allah will tell us that because there is someone believing in him, Allah exists. Because there are humans, this is what Allah needs to exist. This is the second reason because I think this is not what you mean. Someone is confident because he / she can not imagine the creation of God. This assumption is a coincident fact about the world as people can not imagine the world and may not yet be known. In addition, if you buy this hypothesis, that person is already assuming Allah, that is, it assumes the existence of something that creates the world. Now, if you do, people seem to have proved the existence of Allah from the assumption that Allah exists. Therefore, one human being has not proved anything

However, this clearly shows the existence of a. Well, the last sentence (your conclusion?) Explains this.

This is interesting and its change is often discussed in the literature. Discussion can take place within the framework of theological framework and agnosticism (eg recent discussion on these old ideas, eg violation of the principle of justification, see Michael Della Roca)

The most charitable explanation is that we can not understand that the chain of infinite causes is a characteristic of God, it can infer from (2.). So there is a reason to believe that Allah exists. Again, if this is correct, we are still not showing anything because we insist on the need to prescribe Allah.

If you can not find the evidence of God in a scientific way, there is no doubt that God exists and is outside the scope of our scientific understanding. In the gap, as they say. Using it is only a small problem. Given that the possibility that God exists and functions is increasing more and more - you know that you may not know how much you will increase. In other words, the gap only spreads out

Please do a little disclaimer before I jump into how it works. What I'd like to insist is not evidence of the existence of a particular god. It merely explains why the "God of the God" reasoning line is a very ineffective way to oppose any god or the possibility of God. Besides, the irony is the reason it is an argument created by non religion and arrogance. This kind of emotion is essentially the intellectual cornerstone of modern Western scientific tradition, so I believe that scientists who protect from the viewpoint of good or sufficient knowledge are important. It is because it does not exist. After centuries of serious scientific research on the essence of our existence, we certainly do not have this today.