The main problem here is technology. If people can easily use technology as you might think, I will not see people intertwining when they are next to each other. This is a very good book to prove that this is a feed. Feed is a society in which people take technical matters, show television, send text messages to people based on their ideas, and show advertisements without you doing anything. If you want to check out, please visit this link. http://www.lmgtfy.com/? q = Feed
It may be a problem, technology is the main problem. Even if we need to speak with other people far away, we use it too much. I saw someone writing down the people next to them. When I can easily choose when to use technology like myself, I do not use technology so much for growth, so I can easily talk with my neighbors. Technology also inherits our work and ideas. We can hardly fight back. We will make a technical request for us. If you want more evidence, please read FEED. This is a good book about society, anyone (or most people have a feed [technology development]), you can easily send people from your thoughts without doing anything. Just as I do not know how most people become google, I display advertisements.
The problem is that while Google is aware that technology recognizes the dangers of our lives, we are constantly looking for new ways and technologies to take over our lives. At the same show, it revealed others that it's working. Google Assistant from Dystopian SF movies: Artificial intelligence to make phone calls for you. Google CEO Sundar Pichai showed Google Assistant 's appointment to make a hair reservation by phone, and the audience obviously brought joy. If "helper" randomly puts a positive positive "mmm-hmm" on the phone, I will really get them. Mr. Pikai said, "It is amazing that assistants actually understand the nuances of conversation." We also set up Google Lens, a visual search tool that shows that we can locate information about things around and recognize it. There is also an introduction to all of your friends' apartments and even Zadie Smith's novels.
Because technology takes over our life, it is not an exaggeration, we have developed a way to communicate with each other through technology. Nonetheless, we often complain that we are misunderstood by someone else. But what if technology itself understands us well? In most cases, it seems to know exactly what we want. What if it could explain our emotions? What if it might affect our decision? Fundamentally, emotion is a reaction in the brain, and we often change the state of our body. For example, expression change, intonation, body language, blood flow, body temperature and so on. Therefore, we need to make this physical property measurable and quantify technology. Emotion is our idea to explain these emotions supported by experience, association, career, memory, etc. Marketers use these emotions to make actions
Do technologies occupy our lives? Even better, does it compromise our relationship with familiar people? You may not even know. Of course, text messages, pictures, adventures look cool, but are they worth losing one-on-one communication? When you talk to someone, how does it feel when they concentrate on their phone? "I would like to tell you important things, maybe you are staring at your phone?" Phones and technologies are gradually killing people. So far. They will take us us far from the people near us. They limit our ability to observe and recognize people, especially our important people.