Is Revenge Ever Justified?

According to http://dictionary.com, revenge can be defined as "applying punishment to". This definition means that revenge is a routine and healthy one; humans as a whole need revenge to maintain the general moral principles of society. An example of retaliation is that someone drives a car under the influence of alcohol, and in retaliation the government will cancel the driver's license. This is not a form of revenge, it is simply to keep other citizens safe. According to most people's criteria, this is not totally revenge. It is because there is no malice. But this is revenge for those who lost their license. Another example of revenge is that two boys play games in the schoolyard of the school. A boy began to cheer with the victory of the game and another boy beating him in his mouth because he was angry. This also applies to the definition of revenge "to punish", but the boy who won the game has no mistakes - except for the boy who failed. This failing boy may think that celebrations are ridiculous and angry and attacking the winner. These examples show that the argument that revenge is reasonable is not by the situation itself, but by person's perception of the situation significantly. Returning to the first example, a judge who may have decided to properly punish a damaged driver can quickly decide whether to cancel the driver's license. I am stupid. . But assuming that the driver's wife [assuming that the doctor may be asked to return home from the bar immediately after notifying his son that there is pneumonia] ... she is about another male incident There are more people than the viewpoint judge

Revenge, is this reasonable? I will talk about it later. First of all, what is revenge? I do not know what that really means. It is not the meaning of a dictionary, it actually means that. Because revenge is a human thing, everyone is different. For example, retaliation against someone throws water polo to someone you do not like, and for others it throws grenades. I call it a thing, because it is not everywhere, I do not know if it is emotional or instinctive. But we all know that this is wrong. So why do we feel that we need revenge? There are three examples of revenge you should read.

Revenge makes sense. A reasonable definition is "to complete for legitimate reasons". We must know exactly what is legitimate so that it can be justified. Merriam-Webster defines the term "legal" as "based on rule or law." Therefore, in order to complicate the report, it must be executed under the conditions of the law. Vengeance is an act that harms people's mistakes. By allowing the judicial system to legitimately make correct decisions, victims can retaliate. This is an example of organizational revenge. One day a thief invaded the house and killed his mother. There was much evidence that the police arrived and a thief was arrested. My family was destroyed and I decided to give him the death penalty when the thief was searched. The judgment committed a crime and was sentenced to death by a command of a thief judge.

In the discussion we are thinking, the more fundamental problem that has not yet been solved and is generally ignored is whether private retaliation (act of retaliation without legal authority) is reasonable or not . This question can be interpreted as two versions: Is private revenge just fair? And: Is private revenge morally correct? The latter version seems to have found the answer. One way to reach an agreement in existing literature is often to imply rather than assert that personal retaliation can not be morally justified by itself.