Is revenge ever justified?

Best answer: Revenge is an artificial conclusion. It is necessary to judge the situation from a personal or personal point of view. It is necessary to judge the problem from a social or common point of view. The best way is to generally judge actions based on high standards. We should also try to analyze why our counterparts are addicted to behaviors that we retaliate. What is his mental state? Why does he do this? We should enter into his mind and see his view.

Secondly, for revenge, we may want to do anything. We must not pass the law to our hands.

Revenge, is this reasonable? I will talk about it later. First of all, what is revenge? I do not know what that really means. It is not the meaning of a dictionary, it actually means that. Because revenge is a human thing, everyone is different. For example, retaliation for someone throws a water ball to someone you do not like, and for others it throws a grenade. I call it a thing, because it is not everywhere, I do not know if it is emotional or instinctive. But we all know that this is wrong. So why do we feel that we need revenge? There are three examples of revenge you should read.

Revenge makes sense. A reasonable definition is "to complete for legitimate reasons". To be able to justify it, we must know exactly what is legal. Merriam-Webster defines the term "legal" as "based on rule or law." Therefore, in order to complicate the report, it must be executed under the conditions of the law. Vengeance is an act that harms people's mistakes. By allowing the judicial system to legitimately make correct decisions, victims can retaliate. This is an example of organized revenge. One day, a thief pushed into the house and killed his mother. There was much evidence that the police arrived and a thief was arrested. My family was destroyed and I decided to give him the death penalty when the thief was searched. The judgment committed a crime and was sentenced to death by a command of a thief judge.

In the discussion we are thinking, the more fundamental problem that has not yet been solved and is generally ignored is whether private retaliation (act of retaliation without legal authority) is reasonable or not . This question can be interpreted as two versions: Can personal verbalization just be done? And: Is private revenge morally correct? The latter version seems to have found the answer. One way to reach an agreement in existing literature is often to imply rather than assert that personal retaliation can not be morally justified by itself.