Is magic a science?

Supernatural magic is not just science, but according to its definition supernatural magic does not exist.

Stage magic is performance. The stage magician applies scientific discoveries in psychology and neuroscience (and other scientific fields) to create hallucinations and surprises, but stage magic itself is not science

Science (noun): intellectual and practical activities including research on physical and natural structures and behaviors through observation systems and experimental systems

Magic (noun): The power of the event process is obviously affected by the use of mysterious or supernatural forces

If you use the magic of observational and experimental research according to scientific method, it will become science.

Science does not necessarily explain the reason why things happen. From time to time science will only decide that events will occur under observable, predictable and reproducible way under test conditions.

Supernatural (adjective): by force exceeding scientific understanding or natural law (expression or event)

Sir Isaac Newton used a scientific method to establish the law of universal gravity, but Sir Isaac Newton did not understand the cause of gravity. You can say that the cause of gravity is beyond understanding of science, but even before the law of gravity appears, gravity is not objective magic or supernatural,

If something can clearly and reproducibly influence the progress of an event, it can not be magical as it can be scientifically studied

Since magic does not affect reproducibly without affecting the process of events so much, it can not be studied scientifically - furthermore it can not be thought of as "power to influence clearly the process of events" . So, by definition, there is no magic.

In order to show the difference between magic and science, I think that the first difference between magic and science is the subjectivity perceived when compared with logic. Science recognizes objective truths, or at least recognized doctrines, but unless it is tied to this truth, scientists will not even accept the most consistent research5. The second difference. It depends on their attitude toward causality. The second argument is that magicians are not interested in causal relationships. In short, a practical magician is not interested in the philosophical problem of struggling scientists.

Therefore, the relationship between science and magic is bidirectional. While scientists study magicians and their crafts to learn more about the world around us, magicians use science to create supernatural magical illusions. The figure below shows the relationship between magic and science. The outer circle shows science related to magic. Performers use some of these sciences as a way to create magical hallucinations. Most scientists in these fields study magicians and their performance

Because magic and science are opposite each other, there seems to be no relationship between magic and science, but there are many things in common. The drama fantasy suggested by the magician seems to be in violation of the laws of physics science, but they often use these and other scientific principles to create these illusions. Scientists are very interested in magic because they try to better understand this unique performing arts. Therefore, the relationship between science and magic is bidirectional. While scientists study magicians and their crafts to learn more about the world around us, magicians use science to create supernatural magical illusions. The figure below shows the relationship between magic and science. The outer circle shows science related to magic. Performers use some of these sciences as a way to create magical hallucinations. Most scientists in these fields study magicians and their performance