Is language unique to humans? Why or why not?

Because some people define "language" as "human language", this is roughly circular discussion, "language" can not be human-specific. Whatever the uniqueness of the human language, it makes it unique and unique. We all agree that human language is different from animals in a sense.

However, there are many ways to define languages. Perhaps it is said to be a communication system embedded in a social structure that can have regional / social dialects. In fact, there are this and other animals on Prairie dog.

Maybe we can concentrate on how to learn languages. That's why the majority of the argument that 'human language is unique' comes from this. The main argument is that the human language is too complicated to learn from input (there are too many possibilities for what we hear, we are unknown spiritual "grammar" You have to guess). Was born. Human, part of our DNA. Of course, it's not a word, it's not everything, but you can "learn" from a specific language such as English by the basic ability (in fact "get" is a better vocabulary). Please consider it as a genetic clue that we have. Let us learn one language. In a way this is obvious, we have a genetic tendency to learn languages. Human beings do this naturally, there is clearly a biological support system. Our brain, our tongue (or sign language, sign language), our ears (or eyes) etc. But the argument about talent is far in our genetic structure than some unique languages. This is still a controversial topic, but it is a popular opinion among many linguists.

Other linguists will say that the human language is actually an extreme form of animal communication. It has more words, more complicated, more social modes, etc, but it has the same basic ingredients as animals, and more it is it

Of course, when meeting with aliens coming from a distant world in some way, is the communication system duplicated? Do they say the word "use"? Or is there a unique element that makes human human and human languages ​​human language?

Languages ​​are possible because many cognitive and physical characteristics are human-specific, but there is no language-specific one. They gather to make language possible. But the basic element of the language is the community. Mankind is a social species more than anyone else and in order to build a community it is necessary for human beings to do for living for some reason to solve the problem of communication . Language is a tool devised to solve this problem.

Because some people define "language" as "human language", this is roughly circular discussion, "language" can not be human-specific. Whatever the uniqueness of the human language, it makes it unique and unique. We all agree that the human language is different in some way from the animal. Maybe we can concentrate on how to learn languages. That's why the majority of the argument that 'human language is unique' comes from this. The main argument is that the human language is too complicated to learn from input (there are too many possibilities for what we hear, we are unknown spiritual "grammar" You have to guess). Was born. Human, part of our DNA. Of course, this is not just a word, but because of the basic ability you can "learn" from a specific language such as English (in fact it is a better word to "get").

In the human world, language and communication are unique due to their rationality. Language validity distinguishes human language from animal whisper or signal. In the animal kingdom, words are expressive. Human words appear on the logo on one hand, but they are not strict. Human language is variable in the sense that it has different languages, and in the same language the same expression may specify different or different expressions at the same time.