Everyday ethics I heard said to morality: "The difference between what you do and the right to have right"
Ensure that the analyst who created the spreadsheet spends a lot of time to confirm your work.
The answer seems obvious to me, but perhaps your personal ethics will lead you to conclude that this is okay. I think that you know the truth, maybe it's like a simple line than anything else. [It seems that some editors are actually looking for more support for your decision to continue this practice. ]
One way to check this is to ask yourself if you would like to inform other people (including your employer) what you did.
Then tell the company what you did and check to see if they agree. If you are right, they will not feel deceived, will continue to offer 40 hours of salary to you for a 2 hour job, saying "continue good work!"
Many years ago, at the University Business Ethics course, I was taught to imagine a specific personal situation while exploring the ethics of the proposed behavior. Let's consider your case: "Is this an example I'd like to set up for your son?" (For others: "If she saw your actions on the cover of a newspaper, you What will your mother do, reaction? "
About a year later, someone queried Etherable and issued a query to Workplace on Stack Exchange, one of the most important forums for programmers on the Web. "My work is immoral as to whether it was automated.The explanation of contradictory encoder accepts the programming show which was originally" input of beautification data "- and half a year ago, all operations are automatically operated I wrote a script to put on. After that it took about a month, but now it will take about 10 minutes. "The job is full time, bringing benefits and allowing Etherable to work at home. This plan brought nearly perfect results and for all management it was known that its employees were doing only perfect work.
In other words, unless automation is explicitly included in the work conditions, it is never ethical to tell the employer that you have automated your work. When I was hiring IT staff and developers, I hired them to do specific jobs at affordable prices, but if they work in a smart way, I do not think that it is the most stolen It was. I will work faster. In this case, companies or bosses who view it as stolen are irrational because they should understand the opportunities of automation and hire programmers, especially to create automation. Automation itself is a new invention. Several states belong to one or the other party by adopting a new invention, but the less you think about the employer's resources in general, the better the new idea or invention is. It is yours, not the company.