Is it Money Well Spent? Election 2004

We live in a more ideal era when it is more expensive. The election cost of this year has become uncontrollable. It is time for the future president to ask myself, and all these costs are necessary. Total election total expenditure in 2004 was at least $ 2 billion, total cost of the general election in 2005 was $ 50 million. Advertisements and personal luxury goods chosen by the president and their families are more expensive than anything else. This free world leader has spent so much money.

Now our election is full of corporate cash. The oil and gas industry spent more than $ 70 million on this election cycle (not counting invisible "black money"). The pharmaceutical industry has spent about $ 45 million. The Koch brother pledged to invest $ 750 million in the 2016 election. This is not just the campaign of George W Bush and John Kerry in 2004. Since the decision of the Citizen Federation in 2010, an indefinite donation exceeding $ 1.5 billion, including secret donations in excess of $ 500 million, has been used for federal elections.

Since the golden era, will the next Supreme Court judge regain the balance of the closest commercial court?

The money spent by each provincial candidate is a useful indicator of which state is truly important in the election. As indicated by the NPR, in the 2012 election, each voter spent more on the swing state than the solid statistics. And there are good reasons. Candidates know these states - only those states - to determine the next president. President Trump will certainly promote his government's expansion of the military budget as the state of Swing in Virginia is highly dependent on military funds. The White House also noted the affection for Ohio's aviation industry, promoted the privatization of air traffic control and gathered praise from Boeing and other manufacturers.

Why are the two elections different? In 2004, President Bush led Kelly in many states, so investment advertising could lead to ineffective arms race competition. For example, Kelly may have spent $ 1 million on the market, but Bush can easily reach this amount. If Kelly's ad can not attract more voters than Bush, money will basically be wasted. Mr. Gordon said, "If you vote directly and reduce your score by five across the country, you may not be able to spend a bit of advertising to influence 5% of the voters." Can candidates attract more people by visiting the state directly or changing the policy position?