Is Human Spaceflight a Thing of the Past?

"For men, this is a small step and it is a big leap for human beings." - Neil Armstrong (Dengbar). When Armstrong takes the first step on the Moon, he may never notice people wondering whether future space flight should continue or not. Some people doubt whether human space flight is worth all the money to enter into it. So why not send robots, others ask, they send lower costs. There is also a question as to whether it is necessary to fly in the universe and beg for others to focus on the problem we encounter on the earth.

The astronauts' space flight in the past decade has been attractive, from the longest record that astronauts have broke through the universe, trying to increase food and putting the bacteria in orbit. Private space companies have also grown explosively and provide access to the universe, including supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). Bigelow Aerospace plans to release the first private private-sector space station, B330, in 2020. The station will be able to accommodate six crewmembers, more space (330 cubic meters internal volume) - than a typical half-house detached space. The project is already in progress. On April 8, the Dragon freight spacecraft developed by SpaceX began testing the technology for the International Space Station: Bigelow Scalable Activity Module

Despite its limited scope, NASA's Human Space program swallowed the bulk of the institution's budget - $ 3 billion annually - just to keep operating the International Space Station. However, the majority of science taking place in space is accomplished through costly robots (compared to humans). What people really care about is planetary science at the border. Mars recently explores Cesu, Comet 67p, Pluto, and Mars and Detectors who visited Jupiter. If NASA reduces its space flight budget, we can further start such a task.