Is gun control bad (yes) or good (no)?

In Article 2 of the Constitutional amendment, American citizens have the right to have weapons. "For the security of a free country, we need well-managed militia, people have the right to keep weapons and carry them, they can not violate." That means we have the right to carry weapons . Whether it is for personal defense or whether the government is about to take over, (Firearms) We can defeat the government if they want to take over. If we are regulating guns, we will not be able to overthrow our government! There is nothing to counterattack! Our founders ensure that a second amendment will be added to the Constitution, so that if they take over, "our people" will be armed to defeat the government. The gun does not kill people, people kill! If someone wants to put a gun on the table, the gun does not start shooting! One person is necessary to pull the trigger. People are guns, not a problem

Last week or so, I read many gun control articles, but none have logical meaning. In the article, the author explains why guns are the most effective killing method. The author says, "The tool is fatal to the right hand but can only kill one person at a time, can not kill from afar." (Http://theprogressivecynic.Com/debunking-right-wing-talking Yes, the knife can only kill one knife at a time, but the knife has a knife that can be killed from a distance.They can be thrown This may sound difficult, but with a good knife, for a while and for trees people can gain enough skills to kill people with a knife I can keep it for a couple of days, but I will stop here If you wish, please continue reading the articles, how insignificant their claim is, it is really beneficial.

Criminals are said to stop thinking about whether the weapons they use are legitimate. A criminal says, "Do not obey the law: Let's say that there are two people armed legally that have never thought of committing a crime using this weapon. This gun has already been registered. Because there is a history and can not legally purchase a gun, this gun is illegally purchased and not registered, the government does not know that it exists, only the government robbing all guns. As I go to know where I have a gun there is a legitimate, registered gun to take him away And if the government does not even know that he has a gun, how will the government bring it Can you do? Even if his gun is already registered, he goes to the black market and is trying to get a gun by himself.

Let's see the benefits of Bad Guy. A bad man who does not have a gun is beaten by a good guy with a gun in most cases, so he always wants to arm himself. For good people who are not armed, the bad guys of fake guns are considered to be bigger than 0 (There is a weak argument in prison to keep robbers in cages, the bad guys know this. But at the moment it is supposed that at least a commission will be paid for the crime committed by the unarmed victim.) This argument is based on the assumption that assuming 0 for armed and good people is from Bad Guy We will continue to speculate that it is also beneficial. In the latter case, he must first consider it because he guarantees a gun fight that can be killed or attacked. The final value hypothesis is the key to discussions on gun control

To say "a good man with a gun" is difficult to beat. But when looking at proper nuances, that logic is somewhat superficial. Yes, if "bad" people are using guns, different guns are the best opportunity for you to stop them. However, many factors make this problem much more complicated than simple tat-for-tat. They include the relative training of the shooter, the type of place and place, the size and composition of the crowd, and the type of gun on both sides. There is no guarantee that good people will do something. Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School welcomed a veteran officer wearing a uniform armed in the field during shooting. The last thing this guy can imagine is to shoot at a high-performance, wealthy high school. He is retiring, it is easy to accomplish. But when his time came, a good man with a gun could not take action. Choking individuals?

As a country to solve collective fire shoots, everyone said "We need to gather." This will not happen as long as the national rifle maintains its current influence.