Is Aristotelian Virtue Ethics a Successful Moral Theory?

Ethics is the first moral theory proposed by Aristotle. It shows that humans can train their personality to acquire and acquire special virtues. Since individuals have trained themselves to develop these virtues, they can know what is right in any given situation. If everyone in the community can do this and develop these strengths, they will have reached the perfect community. This article shows that Aristotle's virtue ethics is a failed moral theory.

The two major moral theories of contemporary virtue ethics (or New Aristotle) ​​are Kant's moral ethics and Utilitarianism. Both theories are adopted by many scholars of contemporary history to satisfy the latest requirements of (more) moral reasoning and decision making, by satisfying objections raised by modern virtue ethics, in particular It has been fixed. Below we will briefly explain the main features of Kantian prototype and Utilitarianism. German philosopher Emmanuel Conde is the founder of moral ethics. He is primarily based on the foundation of moral metaphysics (1785), and the moral thought of practical rational criticism (1788) and moral metaphysics (1797) is one of the most prominent and respected theories of contemporary It is one.

Ethic theory derived from Aristotle is expressed in a form different from virtue ethics, moral ethics, or new Aristotleism, gradually became known, and now it is widely considered to be at least moral and Utilitarian . To the opponent. As recognition is criticized, quality changes. In this article I will discuss the nine separate criticisms I often encountered. Most of them point to an understanding of the structure of morality and the lack of usage of that term to address the relevant real ethical issues. In the first half I particularly hope to clarify that many of these criticisms are wrong and get an understanding that clarifies the main criticism I have about the virtue theory. I refuse to criticize this, but please do not argue that it is not misplaced.