Iron Age Britain

In this article we will look at the social class evidence of the British Iron Age (800 BC - 100 AD). We will see what evidence can be found from the grave, building structure, hill fortress, house, coin, trade, and elaborate items. I will also briefly mention some of the observations made by British early British settlers. One of the most visible and well-known forms of evidence in the social stratum of the British Iron Age is Stonehenge. This structure can be regarded as a joint effort, which is of course the most important.

The UK is an island composed of tribal society known as the Celts. These tribes experienced the British Iron Age until the Roman army led by Aulus Plautius invaded the island in 43 CE. Romans call it the Britannia island, and today the British known as the Roman Empire is called the Roman. On the surface, the reason for the invasion of Rome was that they believed that the UK supported the enemies of Rome. However, most historians today believe that invasion is primarily due to economic reasons, as Britain has abundant mineral resources. In the UK we have everything from copper to silver and gold. The Romans hope to use these resources to turn England into a mining land. Most minerals were sent to the Roman continent, and the Romans sold valuables such as olive oil, wine and pottery to the British aristocracy.

In the 1st century BC, British settled in a society of the iron age. Many of them were rooted in the UK for a long time, but others were closely related to tribes in northern France (Figure 2). The business is booming, with a relatively large population, at least seven different British tribes have their own coins. Southwest Britain and the tribe of Wales manage large quantities of mineral resources at tin and copper mines. Meanwhile, Caesar was the only existing material providing direct explanation in the UK. Therefore, it is essential to understand these areas, as his observations are limited to the southeastern part of Kent and to the Thames river basin. Without a doubt, in the political sense, the story of Caesar is basically accurate and historically in the early scholars like today's authority, including C. Rice Holmes (1907) and Shepherd Flare (1987) It was considered reliable.