Iraq: a Lesson from Panama Imperialism and Struggle for Sovereignty

Iraq: Lessons from Panamanian imperialism and sovereign struggle Why will war continue if the history symbolizes the lessons learned? America has never been regarded as an imperialist country in fact, but as history has proved, the United States has become an international economic regulator of the state and the economic market that makes these countries dependent on the United States I have long-term interest in. Given the recent events in Iraq, people should step back one step and see the history of hostile invasion in the US "making the world safe and democratic". Fourteen years ago, this mantra gave devastating blow to small country Panama.

The core of the term imperialism is the confrontation between subordination and sovereignty. In formal imperialism, dominant power dominates the subjects in the form of consolidation, colonialism, or open protection. In informal imperialism, the dominant power claim rule dominates the subject's sovereignty through various forms of control (all of these doctrines have implicit power threats or other forms of harm ). For example, Monroeism robs sovereignty of Latin American countries (without their consent) from their territory (they can not make it alienate) and their political regime (they can not choose a shape)) It is not accepted in the United States)

The term sovereignty or sovereignty is an explicit term applied to the history of conquest and imperial rule around the world; therefore, in fact, the term sovereignty may be a different form in indigenous languages ​​and legends I do not. Den dominated sovereignty. From the British occupation, a white supremacist writes these stories, creates all the living conditions, establishes the history of case law, drips a new population, drifts into the Holocaust, the supremacy of Caucasians It developed along the way of. Australia's country hid massacres

In the early years of 1903, the United States established a revolution against Colombia, established a new Panama Republic in Central America, and established a treaty giving the US military base the control of the Panama Canal and "permanent" sovereignty. In 1977, the Carter administration decided to renegotiate the treaty according to Panama's anti-US protest action. The New York Times has a frank attitude towards the canal. "We steal it and removed guilt evidence from the history book."