Investigation the Conformity Based on Age Difference without Gap of Age Difference

There is no doubt that young people (17 to 24 years old) have higher performances at schools and workplaces than older people (25 years old). People aged 17 to 24 tend to avoid agreeing to other people's ideas as they know that it is a bad idea. The reason to explain is that people aged 17 to 24 want to attract more attention from their friends, teachers and even their families. One way of drawing attention is different as people can easily discern autonomy. For example, if ideas in a group are different from most groups, all attention is directed to independent groups.

In my research, I found that the age difference meets the requirements. For example, in Australian children and adolescents from 3 to 17 years of age studies, compliance was found to decrease with age. Another study examined individuals between the ages of 18 and 91. The results show a similar trend - older participants show less consistency than young participants. As long as sex is regarded as a way to correspond to status, age is also considered to affect the position. Berger, Rosenholtz, Zelditch believe that age can be observed as a role of identity among college students. Young students, such as university first grade students, are considered to be lower-ranking individuals and older college students are regarded as more senior individuals. Therefore, considering the role of these positions, young people (low status) are expected to match the majority, but elderly people (high status) are not eligible.

In this case study, age gap is also a major factor, and there are many age differences between partner Douglas Fairbrother (53), Jeremy Fraser (48), Richard Price (40), Lucy Hawthorn-Roth (32) . The ages of Douglas Fairbrother and Lucy Hawthorn are very different. Because of the age difference of both, people think that it is different. She considers Douglas Fairbrother to be old, and he thinks he does not want to adopt new technology in his organization. In my opinion, first of all, Doug lacked leadership to take over all of his responsibilities to Richard, but he believed that "what benefits him is good for business" although he lacks leadership to take over all of his responsibility to Richard Because he did not fulfill his responsibility. Secondly, there is a communication between them and a lack of gender difference. Before Lucy joined, not all members were able to communicate properly and appropriate meetings were not held. Even Doug and Jeremy do not intend to communicate with Lucy. Third, there are many age differences between them. partner