Intuition in A Jury of Her Peers

The intuition of her companion jury Men and women are considered equivalent in terms of talent and intelligence, but when Susan Grasspell wrote "her companion jury" in 1917, this is indeed There was not. In the Midwest of the turn of the century, women often do not receive education and have little political or economic power. In addition, as "weaker genders" they can not do anything. Women are homes and fireplaces and they find themselves as a masters of more powerful men in their lives.

In the early 1900s, Susan Grasspel wrote a number of works, two of which were outstanding, the drama "Truffle" and the short story "Peary of Her Fellow". A small cannonball was written in 1920, and "her peer Peury" was written the following year. The rifle was written in only 10 days. The true greatness of these works was not allowed until the 1970s. Among the short stories entitled "Fellow Juries", a woman named Minnie Wright was accused of killing her husband. Minnie Wright is a wife of a farmer and is isolated from the outside world.

The short novel version of the play is called "her fellow jury". This heading means that women and their colleagues will investigate and weight the evidence, as the court jury does. Certainly, men are willing to pay attention to "trivial problems", so men can not make effective litigation and women can even help to do it. But these women understand men and they know that their jury finds that their "sisters" have committed this crime without any doubt, regardless of her motives and the provocation that she can endure I will. They have things in their hands, they are; however, they weigh the evidence and make judgments. This will always remind Too Kock a Mockingbird when Heck Tate and Atticus decided to remove Boo Radley from the trial if he declared Bob Ewell's murder.

I am writing an article whose question is: When hiding evidence, are women of 'rifle' doing the right thing? I am writing articles on questions: women