Introspective Knowledge and Displaced Perception

Reconsidering the recognition of knowledge and prejudice, "Drecke noted that there are two important differences between introspective knowledge and other forms of displacement recognition (p. 60) These differences are due to The second chapter of "Extracting Your Mind" is primarily to try to provide introspective knowledge consistent with representative discussions. The idea of ​​Dretske by trying to explain how this knowledge is possible without relying on the "essential meaning" of introspection as given is contradictory to the commitment of this paper Seems to be.

Murat Aydede objected to self-introduction, which was accepted by a representative writer. According to this model, people understand their sensory experience through inference of perceptual beliefs. Perceptual beliefs usually include external objects. This reasoning must be based on the connection belief that the observed world state shows a specific sensation. Aidede can include introspective reasoning and considers various interrelated beliefs that information available for self-attribution subjects can not be considered normal. His conclusion is that true reflection of the state of man's own phenomenon is not inference. This is also contrary to the Drake defense perspective, but he insists that this will also affect Thai views. His expressionism made it possible for irrational self-awareness.

Dretske finds it by directly sensing other things (by listening to your weight by observing the bathing dial by listening to the snore of the dog while listening to the arrival of the mailman) 110 Dial in pounds: By recognizing the F value of x, one can think of x as F, but Drekke points out that there are two different opinions during the incident. The dog's barking is a reliable indicator of the arrival of mail, depending on the reliable connection belief, by calling, only when the premise about the dog's barking applies (in case the mailman arrives). There seems to be no executable connection belief.

Perception, reflection, memory, and testimony: These are the four main ways to gain knowledge through experience. Would you like to leave? There are several competitors, one of which is super perception, or ESP. For example, you may enter my heart with telepathy and you know what I am thinking. Or, through perspective, you may find events occurring far away without seeing or listening to it. If ESP works, it may be classified as a source of other empirical knowledge. But what? A typical study of ESP includes objects that are guessing symbols hidden outside the line of sight on the card. If the subject's winning percentage exceeds the opportunity rate, this is presumed to be evidence of ESP. However, in this most scientific and rigorous experiment, it was not possible to experiment better than a coincident percentage. We often hear rumors of ESP, but there is no reason to think seriously.