Introductory Essay: Intersubjectivity as a Practical Matter and a Problematic Achievement

JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a nonprofit organization that supports academic institutions to use digital technology to protect academic records and promote research and education in a sustainable way.

The problem between subjectivity in the work of Selm is a problem and it is related to how to break through the phenomenological problem of inner life completely capturing the inner life of consciousness and strange consciousness. According to Celms, Husserl's work "Logische Untersuchungen" is limited in two respects. The work does not test all possible objectivity, but only verifies logical ideals and all possible conscious experiences. Let Celms understand thoughts and perceptions. This paper points out that Selmus of the 1920s proved too little change in life and human culture in his view, in phenomenology of realism.

In this article, we will briefly outline the subjective inter-concept concept. Sharing experiences between subjects is a concept that has important power to understand relationships, interactions, and treatments (In this article we use term therapy to refer to psychotherapy and therapeutic child rearing ). Subjectivity is a process that always occurs in all relationships. As I will explain, it may be consistent or inconsistent; synchronizing, not synchronizing, enhancing or deleting. One element of inter-subjectivity is to harmonize or share feelings. Adjustment is a necessary condition for treatment work, but that alone is insufficient. One person can harmonize with others at a high degree, and there is still a discordant relationship filled with tensions and mistakes. For example, you might know that a child is angry because you said that you do not have children to eat cookies before dinner. Subjectivity has three elements.

An understanding of inter-subjective subjectivity of Buber as described here means that subjective subjective meaning, subjective subjective meaning, results in individual subjectivity. Therefore, it is now possible to conceptualize mutual subjectivity as a process of co-creation if interrelationships are primitive in that ontology. The existence of a subject depends on the existence of all other subjects in the relationship. In this case, subjectivity takes precedence over subjectivity. In addition, Buber (1958, 1 page) wrote, "I did not accept it, I accepted my subject I-Th and my subject, I-It only." Subject and Subject - "Subject" between Subject. I - It is the main vocabulary of the experiences of the paradigm of positivism and "use", where "I" is far from "purpose". In I-Thou, "inner" in "subjectivity" refers to "interpenetrating" subjectivity, which is the overall interaction.