intro to philosophy

Introduction of philosophical articles # 2 Question 1 The Internet, also known as the "world information highway", is becoming the most popular form for collecting and disseminating information. This problem has led to a number of ethical dilemmas about lack of censorship and editorial monitoring in this vast communication system. Some of the questions that arise is where freedom of speech should be controlled to some extent, if so, these obstacles will be controlled.

Let's clarify that. I am not talking to other people how they should teach philosophy. "How does this course introduce philosophy?" The focus is to assert the diversity of philosophical referrals. Some philosophers only teach the whole introduction in the Republic of Plato. Some philosophers use speculative novels to teach introductions. The focus of philosopher's teachings is Smith, Hayek, Nojic and so on. In my opinion, they were not disqualified as an introduction to philosophy, based on fully specified text.

I oppose Tampa's philosophy. In other words, I reject "Plato Republic" as a valid reason for philosophy. Therefore, if it does not contain any works from Plato Republic or Plato Republic, I think that should not be disqualified as a course introduced by philosophy. The use of such a rational norm for what is counted as a philosophical introduction copies one (in my opinion, there is a problem) to prove what it is as a norm of philosophy It is to do.

Also note that all legitimate norms of legitimization of philosophy are somehow copying the appropriate philosophical norms. Perhaps this is just good news for those who support Dotson's important philosophical justice norm. But I think that this news should be of particular interest to those who think that my course may be more suitable as a higher level philosophy course than philosophy introductory. Even if individuals reject the global legalization process, people may inadvertently copy it locally.