Into the Wild by Christopher Johnson McCandless

This book takes us to the world of a young man named Christopher Johnson McCandless in the wild. He traveled the western United States from 1990 to 1992, began his last adventure on April 28, 1992 and entered the wilderness of Alaska. About 112 days later he died of starvation. Naturally, public opinion biased his behavior. Some may admire his courage and exalted ideals, but some think he is a foolish and arrogant narcissist. He died on the way to the truth and decided to return to nature, but I think Chris McCandless should be regarded as a hero, but I can not fully agree with all his actions.

In Jon Krakauer 's non - fiction book "Into the Wild", Jon Krakauer writes an article about a clever, wealthy youngster Christopher Johnson McCandless who wants to tidy up society and have a father. It is a problem. Likewise, in Franz Kafka 's novel "The Metamorphosis", Franz Kafka created a Gregor who wanted to escape from society with his father' s problem but was not wealthy. Both of the characters desire to escape from society, but only Christopher Johnson McCandless can escape from society. Unlike Gregor, in the novel 'Transformation', he became a bug as he was unable to remove society.

Soon after Christopher Johnson McCandless died, Jon Karkur wrote a story about the wild. At the beginning he told the story of McCandless, the real name of Alex who died at the age of 24 when he was hitchhiking in Alaska and the wilderness, and was in charge of the editor of the outside magazine. His article describes how Alex suffered from hunger and ambiguity, how he gave up his name, the balance of the bank, burned his wallet, and used his whole life throughout his life .

In his novel "The Wild", Jon Krakauer uses rhetorical means to tell that Christopher McCandless is not a suicidal child - an introduction to field rhetorical analysis thesis. The pursuit of ambitious truth by McCandless is what everyone must experience, including the author himself. Clacauer wrote that they talk to the majority of his audience that they thought that McCandless started the wish for his death and led to his fate. He used his own stories to prove that Christopher McCandless was not the audience he thought he was. Krakauer uses logic and emotions to prove that McCandless and McCandless have similar features. McCandless, like anyone else, is looking for the truth.