Interpreting The French Revolution

In 1789 it proved to be an important and historical period in which political turmoil, radical social movement, and the French old monarchy were dismantled. The tennis court attacked Bastille and pledged to decide the spiritual and historical significance of the French Revolution through the unprecedented attack on Versailles and the use of guillotines, "Declaration on Human Rights and Civil Rights." Because of the importance of intense political and social reform, many positions were taken to explain the revolution.

Marxian historian responded acutely to Alfred Cobb's "social interpretation of the French Revolution". Class attacks were primarily aimed at imposing Marxist development laws. Revisionist historians objected to Soboul's idea that revolutionary behavior promoted "progress". The French Revolution certainly did not create an industrialized society of the city. However, the denial of the importance of abolishing the feudalism system and the reform of the law brought about by the revolution are indicative of ideological bias. Using the French Revolution to identify "socialism" is outdated. That term was not widely used until the 19th century. The population of France increased from 21 million in 1700 to 28 million in 1790.

The American and French revolution argues that their goal is to create a new political system based on the principle of freedom and equality. But the interpretation of these views by American founders is quite different from the French revolutionaries' interpretation. How do different interpretations of the concept of freedom and equality affect the results of the two revolution and heritage? Analysis, comparison and comparison American official revolution

Arendt asked about the interpretation of modern political revolution by liberalism and Marxism (such as France and the United States). For liberals it is controversial that these revolutions are primarily to include the establishment of a limited government and to provide space for individual freedom beyond the scope of the state. In response to the Marxist interpretation of the French Revolution she questioned the debate being promoted by a "social problem", a universal attempt to overcome poverty and exclusion of minority monopolistic assets in the ancient regime. Instead, Arendt claims that these modern revolutionary differences are indicative of the use of basic political power (although in a short period of time). freedom