Internet Governance

Internet governance can be defined as evolving policies and mechanisms making decisions about the development and use of the Internet by many stakeholders of the Internet community.

The term "Internet governance" covers the main objectives of the 2005 World Summit on Information Society (WSIS).

Internet governance includes a wide range of problems ranging from routine technical and operational work on the Internet to public policy problems such as fighting crime on the Internet. Discussions on Internet governance are taking place in many forums. For a long time, multi-stakeholder institutions developed for these purposes have discussed discussions on technical and business Internet governance. NRO has played an active role in many discussions, working with the following forums and organizations.

We encourage all stakeholders to communicate with their regional Internet registry to learn more about the opportunities to participate in Internet governance dialogue.

Since the beginning of the Internet, NRO and the Regional Internet Registrar (RIR) have actively cooperated with various stakeholders to ensure the future of the Internet and continued stability. NRO promises to continue this collaboration and cooperates with many governments and related global institutions to become interested in the development of the Internet.

Educational institutions and international organizations on Regional Internet Registry Authority (RIR) structure and bottom-up community driven number resource management model

Promote opportunities to share meaningful insights that influence not only today but also future Internet numbers resource allocation and management

NRO is actively engaged and continues to participate in the following Internet governance-related forums and committees.

Before and after the survey, we designed a survey to evaluate the impact of participation in knowledge on IGF's Internet governance issues, the impact of Internet governance issues on self-efficacy, and the reliability of various institutions related to Internet governance did. The survey report was distributed through Internet governance-related list servers (GigaNet, Internet Society, Internet Governance Core Group, IGF Dynamic Alliance, etc.) before and after the 2016 IGF survey held in Guadalajara, Mexico.

Measure changes in trust by capturing three different aspects of universal trust in Internet governance agencies, trust in clear Internet governance agencies, and trust in institutions making decisions about the structure of IGF itself . First, there are statistically significant differences in all three dimensions measured. In general, our participants are more likely to trust civil society than the private or public sector. In the development of the Internet governance decision, our participants tend to trust my organization (IETF, IGF, ICANN) more than their UN organization (UNESCO, DESA, ITU, UN General Assembly). The government has the lowest level of trust and WTO. Regarding the decision of the IGF itself, participants are more confident than the United Nations organization, IGF Secretariat, and IGF MAG, which manage IGF within the United Nations organization.

With over 10 years history, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) has collected thousands of people from around the world at its annual meeting. Participants from academia, civil society, government, technology community, and the private sector gathered, from the very technical domain system to the most vital social problems surrounding online diversity and online participation about the most pressing Internet governance issue Discuss and examine. . IGF is diverse in scope across borders, neither being binding nor prescriptive, it supports the discussion of Internet governance by stakeholders.