International Capitalism and Gender

International economic strength has power to change society, but there are good and bad things, but as things go south, since culture incorporates an international political economy system that determines culture, It is not easy to separate them from influences. The role of capitalism in the overall situation In order to understand the change that occurs as a result of capitalism, society defines the meaning (eg, relatives and race) of the networks that make up society. We continue to see that one category being used is a social structure that enables gender and people to understand the differences.

Gender is biological, psychological and social. Sexual anatomy (we often consider it as an indication of "real" sex of a person), our psychological or intrinsic sexual consciousness (gender identity), and the social expression of this identity Role and expectation of gender The anatomy of our cultural use is a key indicator of sex. In fact, medical professionals use anatomical methods to assign sexual behavior to babies at birth. Later, we assume that the child grows and determines the sex considered to correspond to the specified gender. However, in our current studies it is suggested that gender identity is also a biological process unrelated to the development of sexual anatomy. Anatomy and human gender psychology do not necessarily match the way we think it should be. Gender as a human is a complex interaction between biology, psychology and society - but it is not that complicated.

In addition to different theoretical treatments beyond sex and variable gender, gender and sex as a category of analysis, international relations feminists also differ in their understanding of gender relationship building and reproduction. In short, some feminists place gender in the substance structure, others feminists consider gender as a gender that exists in discourse process. This difference between feminists in international relations reflects the development of feminist theory on neo-Marxism, constructivism and posterior theory. Efforts to change gender control depend heavily on how to understand or explain its existence. Therefore, the difference in gender ontology is normatively important in feminism in international relations. Naturally, the possibilities of feminist agencies differ depending on whether gender is important or discourse structure.