Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, by David Entwistle

This is the second edition of David Entwistle issued by Wipf and Oregon Stock Company in 2010. Entwistle is a Christian and licensed psychologist, belongs to Molone University in Canton, Ohio, and serves as psychology department head and teaches courses related to licensing disciplines. This book is clearly not written for new religious people. But it is written for those who are interested in fusion of science and religion. The author's aim in writing this book is to determine the relationship between psychology and theology.

David Entwistle's comprehensive approach to psychology and Christianity explains the fundamental question of whether Christians can play their role in psychology. By combining science and theology, the author takes the position that psychology and Christianity can help the individual serve the Lord within the range of love. In this book, Entwistle gives a brief understanding of the interaction between theology and science through the historical analysis of psychology, and it features how individuals help them to help God and society , I will explain whether I have qualities and talents. 35-37)). A person can not be an effective psychologist unless a correct foundation is caught by Christianity as a moral concept. Regarding these, our society is shaped by history and the environment.

In David N. Entwistle (2010) 's book' Integrated Method of Psychology and Christianity ', readers are first introduced about conflict between psychology and Christianity. The idea is that Christianity is based on faith and psychology is based on truth. Therefore, Christianity and psychology may not coexist. "The fusion of psychology and theology is actually inevitable because it is interested in understanding the ambiguity and mystery of human behavior and healing the collapse of humans" (Entwistle, 2010, p.51) Basic , This statement is the whole. Total reading There are two conflicting categories of Christianity and psychology, but these two ideas still have the ability to integrate and execute each other. (Entwistle, 2010, p.16) Continuing, Entwistle explained that science and belief are contradictory views as science and beliefs contradict each other.