Innocence Sabotaged

In today's American society civilization rarely happens. We rarely treat each other with humility and compassion. Instead, our American soldiers abused prisoners, our Catholic priests abused the boys, and our school teacher abused the students. American soldiers have lost their trust in the world since they were accused of abusing prisoners. In Afghanistan, when soldiers searched bin Laden, terror suspects were arrested and imprisoned only for abuse.

In order to maintain control over human beings, egos have to make continuous litigation against human beings themselves. But why can you appeal such pure innocence? Normal way: destruction, distortion, and a lie. As shown in the following figure, he self distorts all our sacred qualities into distorted anomalous shapes, creating incorrect but convincing evidence against our human race. If you see these terrible distortions, you will see how successful you are in yourself. "Yes, love means attachment, everyone knows that love and ownership are always together.Well, dependence is irresponsible, it is certainly enough." - Fine. We baited. We "understand" the essence of our humanity. We "learned" what to expect. A malicious internal prosecutor sent a judgment to us against us.

First of all, the prisoner of war Rubashov showed little innocence. Although the specific assertion of assassination and destruction of conspiracy may be pointless, Rubashov was told that he committed a more serious crime. He has supported this system cynically for a long time and is trying to persecute him to others as he is trying now. In addition, he convinced himself that his confession is his ultimate service to the system. (I remember the novel 'The era of Juda' after Molly Callahan, where the disciples are willing to play the role of traitor to help make Christ the Savior.Kestarler in the Bible The title to the darkness at noon strengthens this relationship.

As a parallel scene depicting sexual violence, the death of Curt Lemon and Baby Buffalo means to oppose guilt and innocent explanations. But postmodern destruction of these scenes accepts that the norm is facing the complexity of moral responsibility and traditional war stories may escape through the attribution of causal stories. In "carrying things", Mitchell Sanders believes that this story event means "clear morality". He replied that other soldiers could not guess the meaning - "I have not seen morality," he insisted - Sanders refuted "I am, a man" (O'Brien 1990, 13-14 ). Contrast with the theme of formal violence which is "a way to tell a true war story" and an evoking explanation for disruptive acting opposition.