Inner Smile - Deconstructing the Heterosexual Matrix

Inner smile - demolishment of heterosexual matrices An important issue, both politically and socially, is homosexuality. Reports on social responses to homosexuality and homosexuality are repeated in media reports. Over the past few decades people's consciousness for homosexuality has improved significantly. Gender is closely related to homosexuality, and many theorists are exploring gender and sexuality under the general terms of lesbians or erotic theory.

In the past decade, the advent of Queer theory accepted the constructivist matrix to validate and validate the existence of homosexuality in the dominant center of opposite sex. In her book "Epistemology of Wardrobe", Yves Kosovsky Sedgwick not only imitates the theory of Derrida but also defends the position of homosexuality in particular. "In fact, heterosexual / homosexual dichotomy matches the pattern of disassembly ... In contrast, it is sexually oriented, there is a possibility of its greater relocation, ambiguity, and duality of expression Essentialism is not much easier to maintain, and it is more inconsistent, more stressful and challenging in all aspects of culture.

Specifically, Butler explains the inter-heterogeneity matrix where "proper male" and "appropriate woman" are regarded as homosexual. She shows that essential agreement between physical sex, gender identity and heterosexuality is not determined essentially; in fact, this agreement is our material anatomy meaning culture It is an illusion mediated by a system of fundamentals to understand the difference. According to Butler's opinion, normative heterosexuality "should not order gender" (1999: xiv, emphasizing the original text). Degraded performance by gender (eg procrastination) indicates sexual or sexual behavior. "Gender may be ambiguous without disturbing normative behavior or changing position" (ibid)

Kertbeny believes that normal sex is what most people decide. So, as long as homosexuality appears to more people, it is "normal". Ironically, however, Kertbeny refined the "unconstrained degenerative ability" of the majority of opposite sex. It's why they are more likely to engage in pedophilia, cadaverism and sadismism, thought-to-sexual intercourse and sexual desire - much more than homosexuals. Kertbeny condemns the tendencies among heterosexuals based on gender appropriateness - it can be regarded as respectable or even prescriptive. By suggesting that homosexuals themselves are corrupt and corrupt, he insists on strange liberation by overturning the definition of Queer itself. But Kertbeny's homosexual / heterosexual will be reversed over time.