Inhuman Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

The former regime used an enhanced interrogation technique. These technologies are considered at least cruel and inhumane. These include warnings and places where pressure is applied. These technologies violate human rights and the rights of detainees. There are few questions about continuing thorough testing. The most prominent is the "time bomb theory". This theory is actually based on logical error. Administrative orders prohibit the use of thorough exams.

The President was using it to explain torture - this is not a method - the phrase "enhanced interrogation technique" - a term originally built by Nazis. These techniques are difficult to distinguish. These methods were clearly understood as war crimes in 1948. Punishment for them is death. As the 56 House Democrats requested an independent investigation on 8th June 2008, approval of these technologies increased the possibility of criminal offense to Bush administration officials. Parliamentarians involved in the investigation include John Conyers, Jan Schakowsky, and Jerrold Nadler.

In reporting on the US Government's discussion on the use of water as a trial technique, US journalists decided to use "torture" and "enhanced interrogation techniques" to explain water penalties Have to. The National Public Radio ombudsman detailed the discussion and explained in detail why the NPR decided not to use the term torture to explain punishment. Since the media and NPR directly criticize the policy, the second part is to explain the desire to explain their position and technology rather than merely explain it as torture.

Instead of torture they are using 'Enhanced Interrogation Techniques'. The problem is that it only hides the same ugly and ugly custom of torture. As a result, people are subject to torture and others are calling it a form of interrogation. Whenever we issue something contradictory to the official story sponsored by the national authorities, the critical seekers like truth seekers and myself are now called "conspiracy theorists". This word brings shame and absurdity to the author of critical publications. And it eventually hurts his reputation, career and research. After all, the dual expression of this expression disturbs critical thinking, people are moved to ask for knowledge or to stop critical thinking to avoid being condemned by society.