This may be the 4th time I saw this, that is when this snow falls in winter this time is part of the DVD carnival. It has hardly changed since "Monkey trial" in 1925. I think that this is a movie that makes me think. It is fun to visit again at different times in your life. When I first saw (childhood) I had a real prejudice to support science only to see white and black - creationist is black and evolutionist is white - this argument . This time, I saw more nuances. You are worth taking a safe middle life - 'I am not political' - or to get rid of the second year's position - at the end of the day, who are you? You have to take a clear position in life, otherwise you just take up space
It has been based on the story of 40 years, but in the 1960s, the movie was a hotbed of confusion and religious zeal. In this movie, science and reason are proposed as cornerstones of knowledge, and these are the reasons for this story. The very famous Scopes Monkey Trial inspires the foundation of the movie and has relevance to the framework that makes up it. Tracy was a strong Catholic in his life, even refusing to divorce his wife in connection with Catherine Hepburn, he objected to the trial and appealed to the evolution of teacher education. Frederic March played the role of William Jennings Bryant and became a southern traditionalist. Both roles reflect the role of the famous legal officials, former and Clarence Darrow. Friendship and anonymity between them play an interesting role in their battle in the courtroom. Drummond (Tracy) is a very difficult character to read and he finds himself to protect someone based on science rather than his own personal beliefs. Brady (March) tends to rely on his performance and speaking skills rather than citing legal books. He is also very convinced of the power of the administrative trial. This allows him to constantly monitor the outbreak. It's about the world view of the two lawyers, nothing, and they fight endlessly, but they do not get what they want. Scenes and speech of the court are always featured in attractive March and Tracy's performances. Whether they are fighting for the happiness of the school teacher who was robbed (he played Dick York in the last movie) or fighting for the destiny of a country that was hesitant and skeptical There are sometimes difficult things to say. This movie concerns contemporary Americans and people of the same generation of the past, full of enthusiasm for modern judicial plays.
"Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, the inheritance wind should practice what it prefers rather than deviating from the historical fact of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs.
"Inheritance Wind" starred by Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards, produced by David Gapen directed by David Papazian, was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama 'Inherited Wind' was inspired by the 1925 Monkey Judgment, where teachers evolved and arrested for accepting class professors. However, the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it as an event to convey a strong message to the audience .
The theme of inheriting the wind that inherits the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee is occupied. The script began in Hillsboro, Tennessee, when a man named Bertram Kate violated the law by teaching the prohibited Darwinian theory. The most famous lecturers at the time, Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond came to this small religious town, Hillsboro. Brady sued Katz and Drummond kept him. - Three strong men expressed a strong view with intense drama "inherited wind" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee: Bertram Cates, Henry Drummond and Matthew Harrison Brady. First, defendant Bert Cates was responsible for teaching "Darwinism" in the second year. Second, Katz 's counsel, Henry Drummond, showed his belief in the right to think. Third, "Giant" Matthew Harrison Brady sued a lawyer and explained his prejudice against creationism.