inform the laws and institutions of criminal justice:

Of course, guessing guilt is not one thing. It is not a rule of law in the usual sense. It's very easy

Administrative fact-finding activities conducted in the early stages of criminal proceedings

The remaining stages of the process can be relatively cumbersome without losing any work efficiency. of

Estimating the guilty functioning in the crime management model is to express this confidence. That

The innocence innocence assumption is contrary and has nothing to do with guesswork estimation.

These two concepts represent different views, but not the opposite view. There is a possibility that the difference will concentrate

For example. The murderer chooses to shoot his victim from a clear perspective for the reason he knows best

When many people arrived, he gave them a gun and told them, "I did it, I did it

"His explanation of what happened was confirmed by several witnesses, he was arrested.

Officers fully utilize their own skills in an informal environment.

We rebuild the exact description of what actually happened with so-called crime. Deadline

The process model rejects this premise and uses it instead of informal and noncritical facts.

This emphasizes the possibility of error: people are disturbing observers, they are disturbing the event.

The suspects forced the police to finally hear what they wanted to hear, not the truth.

Witnesses may be affected by prejudice or profit, and no one will notice these prejudices and benefits besides special people.

The police are not responsible for protecting the defendant's interests. Thinking this

All of these are de facto guilt and persistent, which leads to denial of the informal fact finding process.

Regarding formal, judgment, confrontational fact finding procedure, fact cases against defendants

It is held by a fair court and is evaluated only after the defendant gains sufficient opportunity

Etannibi Alemika detailed the grounds of the criminal law by noting the pursuit of criminal justice norms, politics, institutions, procedures, and constraints. He clearly pointed out that politics decides to manage criminal justice. His argument tells us that he is worried because the researcher pays little attention to the political economy of the criminal justice system. In his contribution to his argument, he brought up important issues of value and legal practice. Reproduce the law as a product of a nation state, and eventually expand the rules of colonial state and colonial law. Therefore, he insists that "in post-colonial society, criminal law is still one of the main tools of authoritarian rule.6"

The state constitution and law regulate the criminal justice system of each country and delegate the authority and responsibility of criminal justice to various jurisdictions, officials and institutions. State law also regulates sin, group or child behavior of the Juvenile Court. There are few crimes subject to federal jurisdiction. State and local authorities are responsible for dealing with most crimes. Protection of the police is mainly the function of the town. Correction is mainly the function of the state government. Most judicial personnel are hired locally

Juvenile justice is the field of criminal law applied to people under age sufficient to be in charge of criminal activity. In most states, the age of crime is set at 18 years old. The juvenile law mainly complies with the state law, and juvenile law is enacted in most provinces. The main purpose of the juvenile justice system is not punishment but rehabilitation. Domestic law, which creates a juvenile court and provides a way to deal with juvenile delinquency, is generally maintained by the court as an acceptable extension of the authority of the state police to ensure the safety and well-being of children. The doctrine of Parens patriae approves domestic laws to protect, care for, maintain and maintain children within their jurisdiction