Influence of the Chinese Communist Party Over State-Controlled Media and Internet Media

"This is not what you said, this is what you said" (Luntz, Scheufele and Tewksbury, cited in 2007: 9). INTRODUCTION In agenda settings, we will focus on specific issues that we consider important, such as mass media and influential political leaders, while explaining those who have the power to support other issues that we think are less important To do. Low priority, public opinion. There are many literature on the agenda setting process, but it focuses mainly on the agenda on the west side.

In the past ten years, the Communist Party of China has been suffering from the super high speed of information on the mobile Internet. Meanwhile, the work of controlling public opinion was complicated by the relatively diverse media situation, hundreds of commercial newspapers and magazines competed to cover the news to some extent. In June 2008, after China lost control of a series of devastating domestic and international stories, President Hu Jintao outlined a new way to encourage coverage of reliable domestic media led news news. Strategy 'public opinion guidance' is often called 'catch speaker'. However, with the introduction of Weibo in 2009, Hu Jintao's plan became difficult.

Since the Chinese Communist Party came to power in 1949, the state has maintained strong fluctuations in information and communication technology control. Historically, the national strategy for the media and ICT has solved the balance between economic modernization and political domination - tension is often mentioned in the current discussion of Internet development in China. In this way, the Internet may differ greatly from past media formats, but you can place it in a wider history of media and ICT national control.

Does the Communist Party leadership head towards an authoritarian state, which strongly controls the economy, media control, Internet censorship, that is, the world that dominates the world's new order? Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World", or George Orwell's "1984" in the 21st century, can you see the realization of the dullest vision of the 20th century? Currently, this seems to be far away. However, from a Moscow point of view, a new agreement with the United States is born. Just before he took office, Donald Trump presented an important gift to Russian leaders: he called NATO obsolete and questioned the collective defense principle of the alliance. The situation in Moscow has hardly improved. Maintaining control around Russia is one of the country's greatest concerns and the expansion of NATO to the east is seen as a traumatic infringement of this claim.