Inequality for All

Former US Labor Secretary Robert Reich presents a compelling litigation on the serious crisis the United States is facing due to the growing economic disparity.

"Inequality" is a 2013 documentary directed by Jacob Kornbluth. This movie is exploring the expansion of income disparity in the United States. This film is organized by American economists, writers, and Professor Robert Reich, and is based on the 2010 book "Aftershocks: America's Next Economy and Future". This film was premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival documentary competition and was awarded the American Documentary Film Special Jury Award. The Empire has expanded the role of income disparity (now the highest level ever), refining this story, exploring that this expanding disparity affects not only the US economy but also American democracy itself There. The core of this movie is a simple question. What is a good society, and what is the role of expansion of income disparity in the worsening of economic health of the country?

Simple inequality index measures inequality of household income of all children. The two summary measures basically convey the same story. The distribution of household income available to families varies widely. Table 3 lists the 13 focus states as high, medium, and low inequality groups. California, Mississippi, New York, Texas are very unequal countries for these two indices. Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin are inequitable countries for these two indicators.

This kind of strength is just about explaining the problem of the winner of the electoral college. Inequality in the size of the country is incorporated in the constitution. There is nothing to fix this problem other than fixing. However, inequality caused by the system "computation only ... discard" is not part of the constitution. This inequality was created by the state. Inequality generated by the state is incompatible with the "one person vote" standard. Five years after Grace vs. Sanders, the lower court heard this problem. The court acknowledged the strange inequality caused by the winner. However, the court did not believe that inequality was the result of "malicious discrimination", he let it go. The Supreme Court immediately confirmed this decision without any discussion or opinion. This incident lasted nearly two generations.