Inaccurate View of the Legal System

Although interpretation differs depending on individuals in many cases, legal rights, human rights, and the jury system are the basic features of the legal system. Nielsen believes that the main purpose of rights is to protect individuals. Meanwhile, Hugger states that the objective of the legal system recognizes and respects certain inherent human rights. In addition, Dooley considers that the jury system is essential to ensure a democratic and fair trial process. Since the rights and jury system are based on these different goals, there seems to be a general assumption that the legal system is designed to protect individuals from government power.

Why is the view of jaundice so common and sustainable? The evolution of the common concept of the legal system is an interesting study on how to make collective reference frames. Galanter keeps track of the origins of Huang Qiguan in the 1970s, the simultaneous trend of expanding legal remedies, and the power of large organizations such as companies to shape public perceptions of laws and legislation 26 . Pedigree, McCann, Hartm and Bloom 27 confirmed the "3D Power" of 24 Mezirow on October 25, 19, Marc Galanter, supra. Oil strike in hell: a modern legend on civil justice system, 40. ALA L. 717 (1998). Shari Seidman Diamond, truth, justice and jury, see also 26 HARV. J. L. & PUB. POL'Y 143 (2003); Lynn A. Baker and Charles Silver, we know the influence of civil justice on the economy and policy of the United States, I do not know.

In general, this is a widely and generally heard view expressing some or all of the following views on modern law. . Institution: The system is full of 'fraud' lawsuits, the jury is not educated, gives anti-business, plaintiffs, greedy plaintiffs and their attorneys tremendous compensation, the system products and services Pushing it up. Costs force doctors and businesses to close stores; fear of litigation interferes with product innovation and trade; lawyers and judges are unreliable - all of which require a "fixed" conclusion of legislation and madness It leads to corruption.

Over the past few months I have come to understand why people talking to the legal system tend to view it as negative and operated. Until this year, my interaction with the legal system contained only a few speeding tickets. Therefore, the judicial system we have is mainly excellent, it can accomplish justice sufficiently, and many critics are complaining ... Well, we complain. But today I am thinking a very different vision. It is one of the systems leaning against the rich and irresponsible to that mistake. Below you will find a small experience that you let me see this bigger problem.