In this study I will be comparing the 2 poems, To Autumn and Ozymandias.

In this study we compare two poems, To Autumn and Ozymandias. I chose these two verses in the four poems we saw because they found that they are the most interesting. In this study we compare two poems, To Autumn and Ozymandias. I chose these two verses in the four poems we saw because they found that they are the most interesting. Ozymandias is not natural but expands mainly in time, and To Autumn develops mainly in nature rather than time.

Compared to "Ozymandias" by Percy Bysshe Shelley and "Viva La Vida" by Coldplay, there is a strong contrast between the two. Ozymandias is a poem about a long forgotten king who once had powerful power over his people, including "Viva La Vida" about the killed king. But the similarity between song and poetry is amazing. "Ozymandias" is similar to "Viva La Vida", but since both articles point to the mountain of sand for the king, both texts indicate that the citizen is the enemy of the king.

The poem was spoken by the speaker who met with the traveler. And he told him about the statue of Ozymandias. More narrator created distances that weaken the power and authority of Ozymandias as king. He is only a part of the story. In Aristotle's imitative theory, the expression here is a "story". "Ozymandias" is mainly the product of Shelley's imagination and is not an attempt to reconstruct history. And there are many differences between the 12th and the description of Diodorus. This number is not standing, not sitting, it's in the desert, not the entrance to the temple. Historian Diodorus portrays the image in an accurate and practical way. But Shelly used his imagination in poetry to describe the statue, but he liked it. Here, we can see the relationship between Aristotle 's thinking about the difference between history and poetry. He made some clear distinctions directly