IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Taking all of these factors into account, in accordance with the Florida Supreme Court's legal intent to incorporate Florida into the provision of 3 USC § 5 "Safe Harbor", the Florida Supreme Court's remedy is "appropriate" as of December 8 It can not be considered. It is one. It obviously departs from the statutory framework on 7th November and approves indefinite further procedures that can not be completed by 12th December, which will ultimately be decided by that date It is preventing.

During the remand, the Supreme Court of Florida issued an opinion on December 22, 2000, despite the Florida Supreme Court Justice Leander Shaw, that December 12 did not object to the reexamination of state law. Agreeing to this view is controversial. The Florida Supreme Court respects the views of the US Supreme Court on this matter and the Florida State Supreme Court can not in any case devise a remedy that fulfills all equal protection and proper procedures at the US Supreme Court I believe. And other problems

On Friday, 1 December, the US Supreme Court heard a discussion on whether the Florida State Supreme Court compelled Secretary of Florida to accept the right lawsuit after the legal deadline. The Florida State Supreme Court dismissed Gore's appeal and re-aggregation started immediately and demanded refusal of the move proposed by the citizens of Palm Beach County who questioned the validity of "Butterfly voting". Goa needs about 14,000 "votes" from Palm Beach and Miami Dade County

On December 4, after reviewing the parties' claims, the US Supreme Court urged Florida State Supreme Court to clarify the decision. On that same day, the judge of the Florida State Circuit Court ruled that Gores required an additional recount. This decision is victory for President Bush. However, Goa appealed to the Florida Supreme Court. On 8 December, the Florida State Supreme Court ruled that additional recounting should be allowed. Bush then appealed to the US Supreme Court. He also urged the court to suspend the retrial until the court had the opportunity to hear the case. On 9 December, the US Supreme Court announced his stay and suspended all reviews until the case was heard on 12 December. On December 12, the US Supreme Court ruled that Florida's re-aggregation is unconstitutional as it violates the equal constitutional protection provisions of the US Constitution.