In Favor of Gun Ownership in the US

When most gun owners use law - abiding citizens who use guns in a responsible manner, gun ownership must not be illegal. The founder of our country protected the rights of civilian weapons and approved the second amendment as part of our constitution in preparation for foreign invasion. However, the current view on the ownership of guns is starting to become more different in urban and rural communities in the United States, as each society is affected by the separate use of guns.

The second amendment allows US citizens to personally own and use guns to protect themselves and their property from attacks. Activists of gun owners believe that personal ownership of pistols will manage gun violence and murder in the United States. If ordinary citizens are not armed they will be more vulnerable to attack because they are not armed. Countries with strict gun laws have a higher proportion of violent crime than the states to be issued. Some of the most dangerous places in the United States, such as Washington, DC, New Jersey, are leaders of gun control reform. The issue of violence is not a regulation by a gun but a poor and declining urban environment.

There is no great correlation between gun ownership and shooting rate. It is not in America. It is not an area. It is not international. It is not a peaceful society. It is not violent. Ownership of the gun does not make us more secure. It will not make us more secure. There is only bivariate correlation. That is obviously not. It's so big that its own "nonexistent" should be a huge news story. First of all, please visit the Wikipedia page and learn about firearm mortality in the United States. If you do not want to quote Wikipedia, see the investigation of "Injury Prevention" magazine based on a survey of 4,000 respondents widely procured on both the left and right sides of the media. Then go to the published form of the FBI detailing the state's overall murder and firing rates. Copy the data, paste it to Excel, and draw a relation with others in the scatter chart.

First of all, they did not use actual gun ownership rate. They use fractional suicide rates as gun ownership agents. This is obviously a very common technique for gun policy researchers, but the results of this analysis are quite different from the ownership data of the injury prevention journal of my first article. According to the AJPH survey, Hawaii 's gun ownership rate was 25.8%, IP was 45%, Mississippi' s gun ownership rate was 76.8%, IP was 42.8%. The Hawaiian suicide may prefer a different suicide method than Mississippi. I do not know, but in my opinion, the use of agents makes research a very rough basis. If you do not understand the ownership ratio directly, how can you check if the gun suicide rate is correctly mapped to ownership ratio? This is because the data set is different. Not all of them are correct. They may all be wrong