In 12 Angry Men, did they let a guilty man go free?

They tried to prove that everyone besides Fangda is biased. But in fact, if you do a little analysis, Fangda is the most biased person, I just hope the accused is safe.

Then on the way he began to be very convinced of his innocence, he just tried to prove that he is innocent ... ... ... objectivity has disappeared

The boy bought a very rare knife two hours before the murder. The most important thing is after fighting the victim. Because that boy is notorious for battle, it is very convenient to use a knife. This is the most important circumstantial evidence. You can not refuse this

But Fonda thinks this is possible, and now it is unreasonable doubt. He is biased, I hope that the boy has been proved innocent

If he is a murderer, no other foolish argument like a boy will go home. Where is he going? This is his house. If he goes out, will he not doubt more?

Then a smart old brings another prejudice I think he needs to pay attention to an old witness. Now this is prejudice. Can someone judge?

Then for her eyewear, she may have a low numbered scene like 0.25. If she saw ambiguity, why should she tell a lie. Please be careful again. Now, who is biased here. Everyone wants to pay attention, all indirect evidence is wrong, the only Fangda is right, because he does not think the two beats irritate those who killed his father.

I mean what it is, then there is debate, and there are two strikes. You do not know what this argument is. There may be some harsh words that will irritate him. But no, he can not commit sin. Because you saw his sad face before entering the jury, he was convinced that he was innocent. Do not be biased further

If you can not kill people after so much evidence, please abolish the death penalty. Please do not give you a foolish reason for your unfair doubt

The way things happened, I thought they would argue even if there was a video of the murder being presented to them

The whole world is plotting against this 18 year old. Eyewitnesses, cinema staff, and even God have bought him the same knife two hours before the murder and let it magically disappear.

COMM 132 October 2, 2014 Film Paper (12 angry men) In the movie, asked if 12 angry men, 12 juries committed a crime of murdering his father We are. In order for a man to fulfill his duties as a jury, it is necessary to analyze evidence and testimony and agree on the guilty or innocence of the defendant after reaching an agreement on whether the young man is guilty or not. As an independent group ... 12 angry men are classic films depicting how resolved leaders can change the whole crowd. Through devotion, curiosity, pursuit of truth, he can convince a group to guess even 12 people. There are more than 12 different characters in this homosexual group - some of them are leaders, but most of them are not. The most powerful leader in this movie is a white suit architect. From the first vote I am an architect

Guilty or not guilty? This is an important issue for young people who are accused of killing their father in a murder trial. Twelve "Angry Men" of Reginald Rose introduced the audience to 12 juries with different backgrounds. One of the most important elements of the play is how their individuality and experience influenced their first majority convictions. The three most influential members include jury # 3, jury # 10, and jury # 11. - Episode: "12 angry people" is a fun and exciting jury confrontation, and twelve strangers sprained the answer so one of the "open and closed cases" became troublesome It was. The trial involved a 19 - year - old boy who suspected that he killed his father when he raised a dispute with a special knife in the middle of the night. His fate is currently in the hands of 12 jurors, each jury has his own resolve to settle the case and reveal the truth.