Implicit Association Test

As everyone knows, people are not always "speaking their own ideas", and people doubt that it is not always "they know their own ideas". Understanding this difference is important for scientific psychology

This website provides a way to prove confusingly conscious and unconscious disagreement over previous methods. This new method is called implicit correlation test, or IAT for short.

In addition, this website contains various related information. If you try the test first, the value of this message may be maximized. You can click the link below to start the demo.

I was redirected to this page because it turned out that I was using a touch device to browse the site. Currently, most of our demotasks are not running on touch devices. We showed some IAT for the tablet, you can click the link below to try it.

If you are not using a touch device and are misrepresented redirected here, please use this link to test at the demo site.

A single purpose implicit association test (ST-IAT) was developed to measure the association of a single purpose category and two attribute categories compared to the original implicit association test (Bluemke & Friese , 2008). With ST-IAT you can give up the creation of another target category that may be of no interest. Our current research is trying to demonstrate the effectiveness of ST-IAT (targeting "self") to measure implicit shame. Specifically, we anticipate that the shy related network measured by the ST - IAT is parallel to the shy related network measured by conventional IAT. Forty-nine Japanese participants responded to the two IAT and self-reported scales. As a result, unexpected correlation was shown. For example, the correlation coefficients of the two IATs were significantly different from the frequency of positive life events (z = 2.77, p = 0.006). This requires further investigation of other derivatives of the original IAT (eg ST-IAT targets "other").

Before writing this blog post I joined the Harvard Implicit Association Test (IAT) as I found it important to face my own implicit prejudice. This test measures the relevance to a particular group and the strength of the evaluation. In the IAT, we were asked to classify words and images and obtain scores based on the time spent. In this way, the IAT has revealed that several categories are more closely related to other categories in our thinking. For example, some find simple and natural things relating negative words and images to specific ethnic groups, or associating positive words and images associated with other ethnic groups. (We encourage you to participate in the IAT at Harvard University and be familiar with your own implicit bias.)