Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review

In order to comprehensive systematic review of the system, it is necessary to search all terms related to research purpose. In addition, electronic medical information systems and hospital synonyms and related terms should be included. By adding * to the end of the term, the search engine selects another format and adds "" around the word so that only full terms are searched. Also by including it? As a wildcard, the search includes all possible combinations

Search uses three kinds of keywords. In the first category, there are "hospital *", "healthcare", and "clinic *" as approximate synonyms of the hospital. The second category relates to implementations that contain the term "implementation *". In the third category, the electronic health information system uses the following search terms: "Electronic Medical Record *", "Electronic Medical Record *", "Electronic Medical Record *", "Computer Medical Record *", "Electronic Medicine" * *, Computer Doctor's Order Entry "

This relatively large set of keywords is necessary to prevent articles from being overlooked in search and requires a number of search strategies to cover all of them. When searching for a paper on implementing an electronic medical information system at a hospital, the search strategy includes the terms shown in the table.

The following three search engines were selected based on relevance to the field and researcher accessibility: Knowledge Network, EBSCO and Cochran Library. Most search engines use multiple databases, but not all databases are relevant to this research as all databases are compatible with a wide range of domains. Appendix A provides an overview of the databases being used. Examine the list of references included in the article that meets the selection criteria and look for other potentially relevant studies that were not found in the database search

If an article identified from various search strategies is included in the comment, it must be an academically refereed article. In addition, they must be evaluated and meet the following criteria: (1) written in English, (2) full text available online, (3) based on important experience data, (4) Focusing on hospital-wide EHR implementation, and a long list of quality standard abstracts have been created. They were all independently reviewed by two authors. They independently reviewed the abstract and deleted duplicate summaries and final candidate summaries for detailed review. In the case of different opinions, the final decision on comprehensiveness was made after discussion among researchers.

A systematic review of the literature was done. Key features of the systematic review include accurate reporting of research questions, implementation and explanation of powerful and repeatable methods, systematic retrieval of scientific data according to precisely defined criteria, methodological quality of review studies Evaluate, verify the critical and systematic features of these, check the main findings of the research. The above steps apply to this research

Relationship between intentional self-injurious behavior and school bullying, and mediating roles of depressive symptoms and self-insult: systematic review

The case study focuses on the systematic review of nationwide implementation and the impact of the electronic medical record system on the health field. In G.C.C, since the electronic medical record is still new, I would like to know whether introducing the electronic medical record system will increase the value of the medical field based on the case study of the United States. As a result of investigating data obtained from a number of community health centers during the year 2007, the cost of medical records has not recovered, but the quality of medical care has improved. Studies of the impact of EPR on the quality of medical care do not clearly identify clear answers to welfare issues.