In general, the scientific community thinks that the climate is changing and we believe there is a possibility that people may benefit from increasing carbon emissions. According to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, human activities have been the main cause of temperature rise since 1950, and when the climate exceeds 2 ° C., scientists believe that humans and the world are serious We are predicting we will face problems. Results (McMichael and Lindgren, 2011, p.
The climate of the world is changing, it is expected to continue in the near future. Agriculture will be particularly noticeable about the effects of climate change, as the temperature rises, the rainfall pattern changes, and pests increase, the world's food system will face new and greater risks. In short, climate change will make food security and poverty alleviation more difficult in the future. However, in the United Nations Climate Negotiations (COP 23) at Bonn recently concluded, this sector will move a step further and agriculture should be included in the "Paris Agreement" through agreement among the parties. The main decision of COP 23 is consistent with the growing awareness of agricultural contribution to climate change, the need for adaptation of the agricultural system to change and the agricultural potential to significantly alleviate climate impact .
Climate change and its impact on agriculture Climate change is a new problem of agricultural production, its geographical location is vulnerable to climate change. For most people, the expression "climate change" means changing the climate of the world by burning fossil fuels, removing forests and increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG) . However, scientists often make changes using this term.
There are two points to consider when considering health effects due to climate change. The health impacts of climate change are big, big and big. The health effects of the use of fossil fuels are irrelevant to climate change and are direct and serious damage caused by the use of fossil fuels. By replacing fossil fuels you can see that you can immediately improve your health condition while saving money. Meanwhile, some medical institutions such as Kaiser Permanente and Gundersen Health are strategic and stand out in the strategy and implementation of climate change and alternative energy policy. Health care as a department is not unified in these activities. It actually harms the communities in which they should serve, the region and the world. This is counterproductive and expensive for their brand and revenue. This collaboration promotes a powerful triple bottom line community, a prosperous economy, a more healthy environment, and society.
Climate change is the most prominent public health threat of our time - medical care must lead the way to healing