The economic impact on health has already influenced the number of registered nurses who provide bedside care to patients, which compromises patient safety and significantly increases the possibility of bringing bad results. Over the years, several factors, such as the size reduction of medical institutions, increased workload, insufficient staffing plans, job dissatisfaction, have had a major impact on care shortage. To date, mandatory nurse-patient ratios have been implemented in several states and many states have tried to pass some kind of law.
Another area being addressed and considered in relation to nurse retention and "burnout" avoidance is the impact of examining the proportion of nurses to patients. We need to fully understand the proportion of nurses and patients and the impact they have on patient response, recovery and mortality. Due to the lack of nurses, this proportion declines sharply, nurses are forced to take care of more and more patients, nurses are exhausted, moody and sluggish, putting great pressure on the whole . If you remember, all factors are "burnout syndrome". According to a study funded by the Healthcare Research and Quality Institute (AHRQ), "the number of nurses is low and the proportion of patients is high is poor prognosis." The quality of care that nurses can manage is related to the patient being treated doing. This is very important. The patient is rewarded
In today's care field, we are working on improving hospital patient care. Several US states are considering introducing the Care Level Act. With the ratio method, the hospital always needs to enforce a strict ratio of nurses and patients. So far only California has paid a certain percentage of attention and is subject to a combined review. Legislative measures took place throughout the 1990s when California health care associations tried to enforce nursery law by legislation and voting. The California State Nurses Association (CNA) has worked for many years in California to establish a mandatory nurse-patient ratio system.