Immigrants are very controversial topics in today's society. Whether it is positive or negative, everyone has its own perspective. Well, the truth is that there is no right opinion. Immigration has ups and downs. Meanwhile, immigrants stimulate the economy, while on the other hand they reduce the economy. The author of the article "Immige Emily Sintek" explains the two aspects of this problem and provides some important facts and experiences.
There are many immigrants' benefits. Foreigners who came to our country brought new skills and diversity. Several people on the other side of the topic believe that immigrants came and just steal our work. This fact has not been confirmed. Indeed, as most people study and the number of immigrants increases, we have discovered that we must create more employment for local people. Immigrant supporters confirmed the tendency of immigration charges or social and economic ills during the period of economic difficulties and social uncertainties (Sintek). They argue that, especially in the case of oppression, immigrants should provide moral, social and economic benefits and increase the number of people entering the country, and of other arguments Many are just misunderstandings (Sintek). The number of immigrants who allow entry into Japan is a factor of the success or failure of immigration. Today, the number of immigrants that we allow is much less than most people think.
On the other hand, I believe the time has come for immediate implementation of immigration control reform. They believe that the country has lost money since immigration has soared since 1965. There is a view that immigrants have not brought benefits to our economy for years, but on the contrary immigrants are bringing a great deal of cost to the American people. They believe this
January 12, 2007 11 = 23% Mid November 14 11 = 25% Late October 14 12 = 26% Early October 2006 12 12 = 27% September 2006 17 13 = 30% 2005 December 16 13 = 29% December 18, 2013 13 = 31% July 17, 2004 12 = 29% 2004 August 14 13 = 27% September 14, 2004 13 = 27% 1999 9 10 14 = 24 November 11, 1999 11% = 25% 11 = 25%, 11 November 2011, 19 = 30%, April 15, 1995, 15 = 30%, 1994 10 16th, 16 = 31%, July 1994 13 years 16 = 29% 11/11/2011 17 = 28%
May 14, May 14 43 37 37 14 23 6 July 2007 13 13 38 41 14 27 0 8 Early January 2007 54 15 39 35 12 23 * 11 Late October 2006 53 13 40 36 11 25 * 11, July 2006 47 13 34 44 13 31 2 7 April 2006 47 12 35 42 14 28 * 11 February 2006 48 14 34 44 17 27 0 8 late October 49 14 35 41 15 26 * 10 July 2005 50 15 35 41 14 June 27, 2005 * 9 52 12 40 39 13 26 * 9 December 2004 53 13 40 41 14 27 * 6 June 2004 54 12 42 36 11 25 0 10 2004 February 58 14 44 37 9 28 * 5 June 2003 54 11 43 38 10 28 0 8 April 2003 57 13 44 36 11 25 * December 2002 54 15 39 37 10 27 * 9 July 58 18 18 34 10 24 * 8 January 2001 18 18 42 30 9 21 1 9 September 2000 (RV) 60 16 44 35 12 23 * 5 August 1999 59 14 45 37 9 28 * 4 February 1999 58 11 47 37 11 26 0 5 January 1999 55 14 41 38 12 26 0 7 Early December 1998 59 18 41 34 10 24 0 7
January 2008 36 11 25 60 37 23 0 4 December 33, 2007 33 23 63 41 22 0 August 40, 2007 12 28 57 34 23 * 3 December 31, 2006 12 12 57 57 34 23 * 4 2006 April 40 15 25 57 35 22 * 3 Late October 2005 46 17 29 51 29 22 * 3 July 2005 51 22 29 46 25 21 0 3 Late March, 2005 53 23 30 45 27 18 0 2 2004 10 Mid February (RV) 56 26 30 42 23 19 * 2 June 2004 52 19 33 45 22 23 * 3 Early February 2004 53 21 32 44 25 19 0 3 Gallup: January 29 to 2, 2004 1 January 1 52 - - 47 - - - - 1 Gallup: 2 - 5 January 2004 65 - - 35 - - - * Gallup: October 6 - 8, 2003 60 - - 39 - - - 1 Gallup: June 9 to 10 June 2003 66 - 33 - - - April 1, 2003 72 37 35 25 11 14 0 3 January 2003 70 28 42 28 10 18 0 2 2002 December 68 35 33 27 11 16 0 May 2001 7 May 61 22 39 35 14 21 * 4 January 2001 60 24 36 33 12 21 0 7 May 2000 58 58 40 31 12 19 1 10