Immigrants, Criminalized

The basic premise of intelligent immigration control reform is a clear distinction between foreigners of criminals and those waiting for Americans. I recognize that illegal immigration needs to act according to law, but treats illegal status as civil affair and is resolved by naturalization mechanism rather than police and prison.

In order to force opponents of legalization, illegal immigrants are by definition irrevocable criminals, the only thing they should wait is expelled from abroad.

Government work like a reform bill to be implemented early next year is to resist this view. Therefore it is annoying to hear that Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary, recently identified "over 111,000 foreign criminals" through a prison fingerprinting program called "Safe Communities".

This seems to be misleading. This program is currently taking place in 95 cities or counties in 11 provinces and ultimately will require all local police agencies to check the federal immigration database after arrest. Thousands of serious criminals, rapists and thieves have been confirmed so far and their exiled person must be part of any reasonable immigration control strategy. But it also found minor traffic violations and visa violations

Since the government is ready to tackle persistent resistance to true immigration reform, it is easy to understand that the government wants to be as strict as possible. Encouragingly, Mr. Napolitano recently announced the President's assertion that the clear path to legalization must be the backbone of reform. This makes the government more important to keep illegal immigrants confused with serious offenses.

Laws must be enforced, but doing so will harm innocent people, entering from Hispanic, entering illegal, criminal in a short period of time. It is brown skin, talks about Spanish and makes the police light blink - it is none to indicate whether you can be forcibly repatriated here illegally There is none. But any of them is enough to inherit the jurisdiction of the whole country.

In Arizona, it can put you in prison. We knew that the civilian house was suddenly attacked by the reckless Federal agency of Long Island, the Japanese worker who was hit indiscriminately in California, and other people elected by road blockade in Northern New York It is.

This could harm public safety. Do not let the police worry about immigrants as they ask law enforcement officials who complain about the confusion between local crime and federal law if you want to leave the police and the prison evictive tool.

President Obama repeatedly promised 12 million illegal immigrants to repeatedly fight for the opportunity he acquired residence. His government should not undermine this expensive effort by carelessly giving the view that future citizens living and working among us are criminals.

This type of remark is not the first time for the Trump regime. Since the first day, the President has supported the main points of the racist speech. In his notorious publicity campaign, Donald Trump urged criminals and rapists of Mexican immigrants and unreasonably promised to make Mexico pay money on the borders of our south border. As another potential government shutdown is imminent, the battle for the DACA Agreement is approaching the climax, and the essentialist approach of the Trump administration 's immigration policy needs to be scrutinized. Continued diversification of the United States and racist concerns about the White House officials' willingness to turn discrimination into law risks us

In the past few decades, the criminalization of immigrants has become the foundation of the US immigration policy. In particular, in 1996 it was a sign of entering as a criminal offense. As a result of 20 years of follow-up investigation, it is clear that the term "criminal" was used as a strategic tool in the 1996 policy. These laws have established the concept of "criminal alienation", but because the US intentionally redefines the meaning of unauthorized purpose in the US, criminal and unauthorized status is often considered synonymous (Ewing, Martínez and Rumbaut), 2015). Furthermore, since the policy has been increasingly broadening the network in the 2000s and constantly redefining those who are likely to be classified as "criminals", this term is currently almost consistent It is captured in no way. This ruggedness makes it possible to draw conclusions on the end of the US immigration policy and the future possibilities of practice led by President Trump.