If it's confirmed that there has been something before the "Big Bang", what do you think about that "something"?

No big bang is wise. "Some things" certainly makes it possible for BB to originate BB first, and it seems there is a reason to think that there is absolute emptiness. There may be many models about what

Your affirmation of "this time scale that happened at the time of the big bang" has not been confirmed, and it is a good idea to prove with science than to merely explain it.

For example, Martin Bojowald's model concludes that time must begin before BB or BB can not start. Even if you do not agree with circular quantum gravity there are many compelling hints that this story is much more complicated than the eye.

For example, without a special order, the infinite time seen from the black hole is actually limited when viewed from outside the BH. Therefore, Nicodem poplaruski model

Let's try Alan Aspect and Nicolas Gisin. This suggests that time is local, not multi-D in an unexpected way.

It was stranger than the novel and frankly, the explanation of simple 'common sense' completely lost their residence rights. Our primitive past has evolved our instinctive "common sense" perspective - quantum mechanics, relativity, and frankly, most modern science has built a foundation for a long time.

"... But what happened in front of the Big Bang, where did you come from in the Big Bang, is there something there is nothing to do?" If you think these are related to the Big Bang, You think that a good answer is "God" and it is a very good thing. Each time we learn something new about the origin of the universe, the watchmaker will be late for a while (or whatever), but of course if it makes you feel better, there are clock artisans Let's. What I can not understand at all is that there is no evidence that a watchmaker simply stacks this particular watch on a shelf and then leaves and then gives bearings that are not soiled. Well, give him the only tragic son, or we should pay respect to them to live a better life, any concern you like because of concerns, interventions, omniscient existence A metaphor of kind?

Our brains are good at thinking about the knowledge, patterns, and experiences that we already have. On the other hand, innovation is something that did not exist before you thought it is like a big bang, but in the micro world. Sky, then boom, that is there, to expand with this new concept, idea, light speed! When you begin practicing it, it is an eye opener. This may be because something is time consuming, repetitive, depending on factors you can not control or seems to be unresolved. It encourages the development of new solutions, creativity, efficiency, better final results, stress relief and so on. It can be applied to all substances in our lives. Perhaps you have to update the recipe for chocolate mousse, or do you need some kind of innovation in the complex relationship you are in?

Evolution is as realistic as gravity. It is no longer just a theory like the Big Bang. The problem is that the Big Bang is coincidentally related. Opportunities are no longer satisfying for us to unite the origins of the universe. It is not an era when you are at least obsessed with science. In his book Biocentrism, Robert Lanza believes that the problem of associating opportunities with the origin of the universe is that it is lazy and "applicable to everything we see" (92) . This includes life and consciousness - issues that need to be discussed