Some people think that children grow better in the city, and some people think rural life is suitable for them. What are the pros and cons of these two places?
Living in rural areas is the best choice for groups of people, but others believe cities offer more opportunities. In my opinion, if the city provides a safe and lush area, I agree that this is a better place to improve some of the advantages of the next generation.
First, the countryside contacts nature, takes care of animals and helps gardening. For this reason, they learned how to protect the environment without technical equipment. In addition, they have more freedom to play outside the home without worrying about security, and in the town they are trapped in the house with smartphone and computer. On the other hand, schools are usually of poor quality and it is difficult to find extracurricular lessons. Therefore, in addition to the school curriculum, the children are still striving to extend their abilities.
However, schools in the metropolitan area are more qualified and tend to offer various activities. Even if there are sports and art courses not provided by educational institutions, you can see other places in the city. Therefore, all children's talent and passion can develop more easily. On the other hand, safety, pollution, and contact with nature is a question we have to worry about. A better choice is a city with a high quality of life where children can play in the parks and gardens.
Overall, being raised in the country is very positive as someone's childhood, but cities usually offer better opportunities for their talent development.
This is a well-written article. I will explain all parts of the task and extend and support arguments and ideas through some examples. Information is logically sorted and most ideas are linked using appropriate conjunctions. The choice of vocabulary is suitable for expressing the meaning of the author, but in some cases you can further improve the choice of the word (the underlined word in the mouse indicates the recommended correction). Most statements have no errors and show varying levels of complexity. In general, this article seems to be suitable for the IELTS band.
The countryside and the city are two different environments. Each item has a positive effect and a negative effect. When a child grew up in a country or town, that is a balance between strengths and weaknesses. In my opinion, rural areas are more advantageous than cities, so it is better for children to grow up in the country. The first is air pollution and noise pollution, and water pollution does not seem to occur frequently in Japan. Obviously, I would like to live in this poisonous environment, not men. Everyone can feel more comfortable when not only children but also enjoying fresh air living in a natural place. Children may be healthier and happier than children living in urban areas because these pollutants may affect their brains and make their children depleted and anxious. Therefore, serious poisoning was not a good condition for children's development.
Children raised in rural areas and urban areas have advantages and disadvantages. It is hard to say which is better. Growing up in the country means isolation to some extent. You are in a small town or a farm with a few people. Furthermore, the people you meet everyday are often the same as you. Most people have the same career as you and go to the same school as you. In this town, people I meet are different. People come from different cultural backgrounds. People in urban areas often come from various places and are active. Therefore, this city does not have the same community awareness as the country. Even if they do not know each other, people in this city can live in the same apartment for 20 years. But in the countryside, everyone knows everyone. Children may get lost or injure in the city, but no one can ask for help. In the countryside, everyone feels that they are neighbors and people are connected