Artificial intelligence, also called AI, can move a machine just as a machine has the ability to think like a human. We do not want to have troublesome vehicles soon, but it is expected that artificial intelligence will have a major impact on the labor force and may replace about half of the US labor force in the coming decades. Research on artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving at a rate that can not be stopped. Therefore, while many people feel that the robot is threatened with the possibility of taking over the job, the computer scientist actually makes it possible for the robot to benefit the country's productivity and individuals gain the benefit of the robot Then I will propose.
Dystopia movies like "My Robot" remind us that humans must maintain control of the robot. Like "my robot" movie, there should be a "killer switch" or a deep-rooted robot that will hurt people. In all forms, methods and forms, humans must remain fully controlled. Also, this is what we offer. China has already tried robot waiter. Royals are in the middle of the chip. What is the next step? Robot police and soldiers? "Robocop" has been completed. Hollywood writes this story for the public. Fortunately, Hollywood's script is still written by men. The human race is still dominated. But how long is it? We are planning to maintain human management using the open source community's cloud funding. Our Nexeraa Aatos open source platform enables all men and women on the planet Earth to beat robots in their games.
Isaac Asimov asked similar questions in his book "I, Robots" (a summary of robot stories). In his book Asimov asked how robots treat "the three laws of robots" which are "manufactured and protected to protect the robot from harm". It is not so obvious to answer this question, "What is it that does not harm human beings?" Therefore, he added a provision and called it the '0 th rule'. Let's talk about "the occurrence of harm to humans due to inaction". Can we claim that complete destruction of nature's balance is destruction of mankind? Then, how about over consumption of Western countries? Imagine that 7 billion people can survive because 100 million people will die. Can you do what you need?