I-Notes arent so bad

In the article "The Disappearing Ink", Todd Gitlin describes StudentU.com. This is a website that sells distributions distributed from over 60 different universities. These notes have been studied by graduate students and are a very comprehensive summary of the lecture. This website and other similar websites are controversial at many universities. Gitlin is an experienced professor with experience and some students who bought notes in writing did not participate in the lesson because they were already lecturing on paper. Yes.

# 3 - What do they do when I say "no"? I learned that saying "no" in the learning process is not a bad thing. After I said "no", the founder disappeared, it obviously did not see the value of the relationship, so I can not work with me, so it is not possible to exclude them it's simple. I said the people claiming No is very interesting. They will be more interesting in time. # 4 - Do they recognize and regain the value of the relationship? Even without my investment, I will invest time, contacts and other resources with the founder who I think is "interested". I was deeply surprised by the founder who thanked them. Sometimes this is in the form of a gift (food, alcohol, candle received some items as thankfully), sometimes it is just random e-mail or card. That means so much as they mean that they think that the value of this relationship is more than just a simple trading exchange.

Complexity: archetypes try to make it as easy as possible for anyone, and absolutely everyone can mark their ideas. They abstract the block chain as much as possible. They are working to connect people's wallet hash with e-mail. If you want to send ARCH (a token with their ownership) to someone, you only need their e-mail. CURATION: Archetypes put all their beliefs in the community and are truly dispersed like this. Just like Reddit, the most interesting ideas and work will be at the top. In this case, just like RARE (and SteemIT), you need to abandon the ARCH token for voting.