Humanitarian Issues in Afghanistan and Iraq

The Middle East has long been a place of confusion and war. In the past, the area was divided by European forces after the First World War. Recently, the Soviet invasion into Afghanistan followed by a power struggle, and American actions in Iraq and Afghanistan brought complaints of suffering to civilians. Especially in Iraq and Afghanistan, civilians are exposed to severe circumstances, and there are many areas where human suffering is frequent. Civilian casualties are more common in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In conflict situations, multinational forces are used to protect the provision of humanitarian relief under circumstances such as Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq. However, its existence is often controversial. Because many humanitarian actors believe that military engagement violates the principle of neutral and independent humanitarianism. Army is usually the most well-equipped national institution for logistics, personnel and goods, continuation of military management of aid and camp compromise beneficiaries by first rescue and humanitarian response to large-scale disasters there is a possibility. The ability to manage sexual exploitation and abuse, and the military recruitment of children, and decisions that displaced persons affect their lives

Humanitarian concerns have no role in the decision to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. In fact, the decision to leave Afghanistan after the withdrawal of the Soviet Union is a major victory for the United States, showing America's geopolitical benefits to Afghanistan, more precisely Afghanistan, during the first decade of the Cold War. I have no interest after the war era. Perhaps the best evidence of purely humanitarian consideration in US decision-making is that the Clinton administration chose to ignore genocide in Rwanda to concentrate on Haiti's intervention plan. In the spring of 1994, I abandoned what I was working for in the military elections of the State Department of Rwanda and started planning for Haiti.

I do not think the war between Afghanistan and Iraq is a humanitarian intervention, but a clear goal of political change, political transition, and a comprehensive invasion to reconstruction. However, these wars were also traded by diluting possible cost and time periods. Strangely, George W. Bush's best economic advisor, Lawrence B. Lindsay, estimates the cost of the Iraq war from $ 100 million to $ 200 billion, and Mitchell is the Director of the Administration Budget. Daniels said that there were too many numbers at that time. No. After that, Secretary of Defense Donna Dramsfield reduced expenditure to "under 50 billion dollars". The US Defense Department president also said, "I do not know if the use of force in Iraq today will last five days, five weeks or five months, but I will not last longer." Year