Humanitarian Intervention and the UN and NATO

In this world, conflicts and crises continue to occur in and out of the country. Due to the diversity of cultural differences, differences are usually small discussions and will soon be a war. When something happens in a country and it begins to get out of hand, it needs the attention of people who can help. Ideas like UN and NATO already exist to help resolve conflicts and crises. It is also a way of unifying the nation by building stronger alliances and helping each other through mutual support and protection.

According to whether the UN Charter is legal or illegal, NATO itself is interfering with the civil war in sovereign states belonging to the United Nations, or NATO is used to replace the UN itself and destroy it Is it there? What outlook of this war has led to the long-term peace and stability of the Balkans? Or did we create a situation that might take more than a generation to solve?

Humanitarian intervention is always an argument against international law and international political forecast. There is no clear definition of humanitarian intervention, and it continues to debate as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is making "semi-illegal" interventions in Kosovo where humanitarian intervention is legitimate and necessary. In 1999 without the permission of the United Nations Security Council. - Hegemony, the historical group, and the politics of yellow and red: Thailand's political crisis from the perspective of gram over the past few years, the political confrontation between the two social forces of yellow and yellow, Thailand is international It has become a focus of attention. Red shirt movement

The UN intervention in the 1990s became more radical and progressive. The confrontation between the former Yugoslav Republic led to the massacre of civilians; the global anger led to NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) The United Nations approved interventions mainly through the air strikes against Serbian resources, and It ended the confrontation. After Somali dictators were overthrown, the East African countries came into confusion. Local warlords began to make their people inaccessible to food and medical relief. After a strong international appeal, the United Nations approved a successful relief effort. But then the bad decisions of the leaders of the United States led to a humiliating "battle of Magadisa" and President Bill Clinton refused to support the American Ranger locked in by the militia. The US military immediately withdraws from Somalia and other international forces